Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, V.
Right arrow Articles by Krueger, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, V.
Right arrow Articles by Krueger, W.
Poultry Science, Vol 76, Issue 2, 306-310
Copyright © 1997 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Relationship between age of commercial broiler chickens and response to photostimulation

VG Stanley, J Gutierrez, AL Parks, SA Rhoden, H Chukwu, C Gray, and WF Krueger

Cooperative Agricultural Research Center, Prairie View A&M University, Texas 77446, USA.

A study was conducted to determine the relationship between age of commercial broiler chickens and response to photostimulation. The chickens were brooded collectively for 1 wk and then separated into five light treatment groups with each group replicated three times using a completely randomized block design. After Week 1, the five light treatments applied were: 6, 5, 4, 3, and 2 wk of continuous supplementary lighting, respectively. Chickens were fed a corn-soybean meal basal diet containing 22% CP and 3,300 kcal ME/ kg of feed from day old to 7 wk. At 7 wk of age, chickens in Group 5 treated with supplementary light during the last 2 wk of growth had the highest mean BW when the data on sexes were combined. When the data were separated by sex and analyzed, only male chickens showed a significant response to photostimulation and this was observed at 4 wk of age. Chickens in Group 5 had the best feed conversion with less mortality and no leg disorders. There were no significant differences among the relative organ weights among the treatment groups except for the pancreas. The pancreas taken from Group 5 had the smallest weight relative to BW. There were no significant differences in breast, thigh, drumstick, and wing weights when expressed as relative weight. However, there were significant differences when expressed as absolute weight. The breasts taken from birds in Group 5 were significantly heavier than the control breasts.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Poultry Science Association.