Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Igbasan, F.
Right arrow Articles by Guenter, W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Igbasan, F.
Right arrow Articles by Guenter, W
Poultry Science, Vol 76, Issue 2, 331-337
Copyright © 1997 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

The influence of micronization, dehulling, and enzyme supplementation on the nutritional value of peas for laying hens

FA Igbasan and W Guenter

Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of micronization (infrared heat treatment), dehulling, or enzyme supplementation on the nutritive value of three cultivars (Impala, Radley, and Sirius) of peas in laying hens. In Experiment 1, 280 White Leghorn hens were fed diets containing micronized and dehulled peas for a period of 12 wk. The dietary inclusion of peas was 600 g/kg (correction was made for the amounts of hulls in those diets that contained dehulled peas). Egg production (P < or = 0.05), feed conversion (P > or = 0.05), and egg mass output (P < or = 0.05) were lower for birds fed untreated peas. Daily feed intake, egg weight, and albumen quality were not affected. Egg production, feed conversion, and egg mass output were similar for layers fed diets containing micronized peas and those fed the wheat-soybean control diet. Except for daily feed intake, which was reduced (P < or = 0.05), dehulling did not affect (P > or = 0.05) the feeding value of peas. The efficacy of dietary inclusion of a crude enzyme (pectinase) was evaluated in another experiment (8 wk). Pectinase was included in the experimental diets at 0, 50, and 100 U/kg and fed to 252 layers. The inclusion level of peas in these diets was 650 g/kg. There was no effect (P > or = 0.05) of enzyme supplementation on all production traits. Egg production, feed conversion, and egg mass output were 81.9, 83.6, and 83.0%; 1.61, 1.59, and 1.59 and 50.0, 51.2, and 50.3 at 0, 50, and 100 U/kg levels, respectively. It can be concluded that of the treatments tested only micronization had a positive effect on the feeding value of peas for laying hens.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
D. V. Ige, O. O. Akinremi, C. M. Nyachoti, and W. Guenter
Phosphorus Fractions in Manure from Growing Pigs Receiving Diets Containing Micronized Peas and Supplemental Enzymes
J. Environ. Qual., January 5, 2006; 35(1): 390 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Poultry Science Association.