Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kwakkel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ducro, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kwakkel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ducro, B.
Poultry Science, Vol 76, Issue 7, 1020-1028
Copyright © 1997 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Diphasic allometric growth of body components in white Leghorn pullets fed ad libitum and restricted diets

RP Kwakkel, MW Verstegen, and BJ Ducro

Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Department of Animal Nutrition, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.

Growth patterns of crude fat (cfat; ether extract), CP, ash, and water in White Leghorn pullets that ate ad libitum and restricted (feed or lysine) diets were analyzed by mono- and diphasic allometric functions, with plucked empty body mass (EBM) or fat-free EBM (FFEBM) as the independent variates. In general, the diphasic model provided a better fit to the data than the monophasic model, indicating that the allometric slope (beta) changes at a certain level of development. Data demonstrate that, under an ad libitum feeding regimen, cfat growth is proportionally (beta = 1) related to growth of the fat-free body, up to about 500 g FFEBM (pullets aged 8.5 wk). From 500 g FFEBM onwards, the beta changed to about 2, illustrating the late maturation of cfat compared to FFEBM. For feed-restricted groups, slopes and transitions for cfat growth varied from those of the control group, according to changes in dietary supply. Diphasic relationships between each fat-free body component and EBM in each treatment had different slopes for first and second phases (about 1 and 0.70). Differences, however, were mainly due to the diphasic growth pattern of cfat per se, and diminished largely if FFEBM instead of EBM was chosen as the independent variable (about 1 and 0.95). Incorrect statements on body component growth in restricted birds, due to the "masking" role of varying fat deposition rates, can be avoided if relative growth was expressed as a function of the fat-free body instead of BW or EBM. Diphasic growth relationships among the fat-free body components were not affected by feeding regimen, but by age. The beta 1 were about unity for the relationship between each fat-free component and FFEBM, suggesting a constant composition of the fat-free body in the first phase. In the second phase, CP accrued relatively faster than ash and water (beta 2 of 1.10 vs 0.94 and 0.91). Results indicate that the changes in growth pattern of fatty and fat-free tissue, both relative to the fat-free body, had not been revealed if a monophasic allometric model instead of a diphasic had been used.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. M. Eits, R. P. Kwakkel, and M. W. A. Verstegen
Nutrition Affects Fat-Free Body Composition in Broiler Chickens
J. Nutr., August 1, 2002; 132(8): 2222 - 2228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Poultry Science Association.