Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Craig, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Craig, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, D.
Poultry Science, Vol 76, Issue 8, 1178-1181
Copyright © 1997 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

A comparison of high current and low voltage electrical stunning systems on broiler breast rigor development and meat quality

EW Craig and DL Fletcher

Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens 30602-2772, USA.

Experiments were conducted to compare the effects of a high current (HC) stunning system to a low voltage (LV) stunning system on broiler carcass and meat quality. A total of 360 broiler chickens were individually stunned using either 125 mA, 50 Hz, constant AC for 5 s (HC) or using 10.5 V, 500 Hz pulsed DC for 10 s (LV). Birds were individually weighted, killed by conventional neck cut, bled for 150 s, and reweighed to determine blood loss. Breast fillets (Pectoralis major) were removed from the carcass immediately after picking (0 h) or after aging for 24 h in a static ice-water slush. Breast muscle pH was determined at both 0 and 24 h. Raw breast meat color (CIELAB) and cooked breast meat Allo-Kramer shear values were determined on samples held at 2 C for 48 h. The LV stunning treatment significantly increased (P < 0.05) blood loss (4.0 vs 3.7%) and significantly reduced initial muscle pH (6.47 vs 6.67) when compared to the HC stunning treatment. There were no significant differences between the stunning systems for 24 h pH, raw breast color, and Allo-Kramer shear. High current stunning reduced initial blood loss and delayed early rigor development compared to the LV treatment, but appeared to have little effect on final meat quality.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Poultry Science Association.