Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneitz, C
Right arrow Articles by Nasi, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schneitz, C
Right arrow Articles by Nasi, M
Poultry Science, Vol 77, Issue 3, 426-432
Copyright © 1998 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Effect of BROILACT on the physicochemical conditions and nutrient digestibility in the gastrointestinal tract of broilers

C Schneitz, T Kiiskinen, V Toivonen, and M Nasi

Orion Corporation, Animal Health, Turku, Finland. CARITA.SCHNEITZ@ORION.FI

The effect of the competitive exclusion (CE) product BROILACT on Salmonella colonization, nutrient digestibility, and the ME of the feed and the production of volatile fatty acids in the chicken gut was evaluated. The ileal viscosity and the fecal dry matter content were also determined. Newly hatched broiler chicks were given BROILACT orally either once on the day of hatch or five times during a period of 2 wk. Samples were taken at 12 and 31 d of age. In the beginning of the study and 2 wk later, chicks from each treatment group were taken to separate facilities to be challenged with Salmonella. Five and 4 d later, the chicks were killed and their intestines were examined for Salmonella. The results of the present study show that BROILACT protected the chicks against Salmonella, decreased the viscosity of the ileal contents, and increased the fecal dry matter content, and increased the ME value of the feed by 1.6% and the concentration of propionic acid in the cecal contents.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
B. Vila, A. Fontgibell, I. Badiola, E. Esteve-Garcia, G. Jimenez, M. Castillo, and J. Brufau
Reduction of Salmonella enterica var. Enteritidis colonization and invasion by Bacillus cereus var. toyoi inclusion in poultry feeds
Poult. Sci., May 1, 2009; 88(5): 975 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
T. J. Applegate, E. M. Onyango, R. Angel, and W. J. Powers
Effect of amino acid formulation and dietary direct-fed microbial supplementation on egg production and egg characteristics in laying hens
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2009; 18(3): 552 - 561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
W. L. Willis, O. S. Isikhuemhen, and S. A. Ibrahim
Performance Assessment of Broiler Chickens Given Mushroom Extract Alone or in Combination with Probiotics
Poult. Sci., September 1, 2007; 86(9): 1856 - 1860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Poultry Science Association.