Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bakst, M.
Right arrow Articles by Akuffo, V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bakst, M.
Right arrow Articles by Akuffo, V
Poultry Science, Vol 77, Issue 8, 1228-1233
Copyright © 1998 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Gross appearance of the turkey blastoderm at oviposition

MR Bakst, SK Gupta, W Potts, and V Akuffo

Germplasm and Gamete Physiology Laboratory.

The blastoderm (fertilized ovum) and unfertilized germinal disc (UGD) of fresh laid eggs and eggs stored prior to incubation exhibit subtle but definable morphological variations. Such variations may lead to difficulty when attempting to determine true flock fertility based on the appearance of the blastoderm/UGD. The objectives of this study were to define and categorize such morphological variations and to determine whether sperm influence the frequency distribution of the different categories. Eleven categories of blastoderms were defined based on the relative density and appearance of the area alba, area pellucida, area opaca, and the periblast. The majority of the blastoderms were included in the first four categories. Unfertilized germinal discs were divided into six categories and were best differentiated from the blastoderms by the presence of vacuoles around its central dense area. They were also discernible from blastoderms based on their overall denser appearance. Differences in the frequency distribution of some of the UGD categories between virgin and inseminated hens may be due to the effect that supernumary sperm may have on the organization of the UGD (no fertilization but supernumary sperm present) or blastoderm (fertilized but failed to develop). It is recommended that before starting true fertility determinations during fresh egg breakouts, one should study the appearance of the UGD from virgin hens and then the blastoderm from inseminated hens. One then will learn to appreciate the subtle differences in shape and density of the blastoderm/UGD structural components.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
H. M. Parker and C. D. McDaniel
Parthenogenesis in unfertilized eggs of Coturnix chinensis, the Chinese painted quail, and the effect of egg clutch position on embryonic development
Poult. Sci., April 1, 2009; 88(4): 784 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
N. Sellier, J.-P. Brillard, V. Dupuy, and M. R. Bakst
Comparative Staging of Embryo Development in Chicken, Turkey, Duck, Goose, Guinea Fowl, and Japanese Quail Assessed from Five Hours After Fertilization Through Seventy-Two Hours of Incubation
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2006; 15(2): 219 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Poultry Science Association.