Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sarlin, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hargis, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sarlin, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hargis, B.
Poultry Science, Vol 77, Issue 8, 1253-1257
Copyright © 1998 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Evaluation of alternative sampling methods for Salmonella critical control point determination at broiler processing

LL Sarlin, ET Barnhart, DJ Caldwell, RW Moore, JA Byrd, DY Caldwell, DE Corrier, Deloach JR, and BM Hargis

Department of Poultry Science, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station 77843, USA.

Several sampling methods have been developed for the detection of Salmonella on broiler carcasses during commercial processing. The present study evaluated three sampling methodologies for sensitivity of Salmonella detection on processed broiler carcasses. Furthermore, the effect of crop removal or chill tank exposure on the frequency of Salmonella recovery was also examined. In two experiments, swab, skin, and carcass rinse samples were compared for sensitivity of Salmonella detection. The results indicated that culture of swabs was less effective (P < 0.05) for Salmonella detection than either skin or carcass rinse samples. No significant (P > 0.05) differences were observed in Salmonella recovery from culture of skin or carcass rinse. In two subsequent experiments, skin and carcass rinse samples were found to be equally sensitive in their ability to detect Salmonella. Additionally, the stages of processing between feather and crop removal were observed to cause significant (P < 0.05) increases in Salmonella recovery within an individual flock. Similar increases (P < 0.05) in Salmonella recovery were also observed following crop removal and immediately following immersion chilling in two separate flocks. These results suggest that culture of skin samples obtained from the thoracic inlet region may be a viable alternative to the traditional whole carcass rinse method for sensitivity of Salmonella detection. Furthermore, these experiments provided some evidence that the majority of Salmonella cross-contamination of carcasses prior to immersion chilling occurred following evisceration, with the chill tank potentially providing a major site for cross-contamination between Salmonella-negative and-positive flocks.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
J. F. Hannah, D. L. Fletcher, N. A. Cox, D. P. Smith, J. A. Cason, J. K. Northcutt, L. J. Richardson, and R. J. Buhr
Impact of added sand on the recovery of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Escherichia coli, and coliforms from prechill and postchill commercial broiler carcass halves
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2009; 18(2): 252 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Poultry Science Association.