Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gast, R.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gast, R.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, P.
Poultry Science, Vol 78, Issue 1, 57-61
Copyright © 1999 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Application of negative air ionization for reducing experimental airborne transmission of Salmonella enteritidis to chicks

RK Gast, BW Mitchell, and PS Holt

USDA, ARS, Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, Athens, Georgia 30605, USA. rkgast@arches.uga.edu

Electrostatic space chargers were used to impart a negative charge to airborne dust particles and thereby cause them to be attracted to grounded surfaces. To determine whether negative air ionization could affect the airborne transmission of Salmonella enteritidis, chicks were housed in four controlled-environment isolation cabinets in which airflow was directed across an unoccupied central area from one ("upstream") group of birds to another ("downstream") group. Negative air ionizers were installed in two of these cabinets. In three replicate trials, groups of chicks were placed in the upstream ends of the transmission cabinets and orally inoculated with S. enteritidis at 1 wk of age. On the following day, 1-d-old chicks were placed in the downstream ends of the cabinets. When chicks were sampled at 3 and 8 d postinoculation, S. enteritidis was found on the surface of 89.6% of the downstream chicks from cabinets without negative air ionizers, but on only 39.6% of the downstream chicks in the presence of the ionizers. Similarly, S. enteritidis was recovered from the ceca of 53.1% of sampled downstream chicks in cabinets without ionizers, but from only 1.0% of the ceca of chicks in cabinets in which ionizers were installed. The presence of the ionizers was also associated with reduced levels of circulating airborne dust particles. Reducing airborne dust levels may thus offer an opportunity to limit the spread of S. enteritidis infections throughout poultry flocks.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
T. S. Roumeliotis and B. J. Van Heyst
Summary of Ammonia and Particulate Matter Emission Factors for Poultry Operations
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2008; 17(2): 305 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
C. W. Ritz, B. W. Mitchell, B. D. Fairchild, M. Czarick III, and J. W. Worley
Improving In-House Air Quality in Broiler Production Facilities Using an Electrostatic Space Charge System
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2006; 15(2): 333 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Poultry Science Association.