Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Hester, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Hester, P.
Poultry Science, Vol 78, Issue 12, 1703-1710
Copyright © 1999 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction induced in broilers by killed Staphylococcus aureus

XY Zhu, RE Porter Jr, and PY Hester

Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.

A trial was conducted to determine whether the delayed footpad reaction (DFR) induced by killed Staphylococcus aureus in chickens is a delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction. Five criteria were used to assess DTH: 1) DFR with a peak response at 24 to 48 h postchallenge, 2) inhibition of monocyte/macrophage migration, 3) lymphocyte blastogenic response, 4) mononuclear cell infiltration at the challenge site, and 5) passive transfer of DFR by splenic lymphocytes. Broilers were sensitized twice with a s.c. injection in the neck of S. aureus antigen (150 microg/bird) diluted in polyethylene glycol at 3 and 4 wk of age. Controls were s.c. injected with polyethylene glycol. At 6 wk of age, a migration inhibition test was conducted before the birds were challenged intradermally with S. aureus antigen (75 microg/bird) in PBS in the right footpad. The left footpad was injected with PBS. The thickness of the footpad was measured at 0, 4, 24, and 48 h postchallenge to evaluate the DFR. After challenge, blood was collected for the lymphocyte blastogenesis assay. Birds were euthanatized, and both footpads were removed for histology. The spleens were collected aseptically; splenic lymphocytes were injected i.v. into recipient birds. Sensitized birds showed an increase in the DFR (P < 0.02) and blastogenic response (P < 0.01) compared with nonsensitized birds. Delayed footpad reaction reached a maximum response at 24 h postchallenge. The in vitro migration of monocytes/macrophages from sensitized birds was significantly inhibited (P < 0.01). The histological appearance of S. aureus-injected footpads was characterized by dermal edema and perivascular infiltrates of small lymphocytes and macrophages. Birds that received sensitized splenic lymphocytes had a significantly pronounced DFR following challenge with S. aureus when compared with birds that received nonsensitized lymphocytes (P < 0.0001). These results indicated that the DFR can be used as a standard in vivo test for cell-mediated DTH reaction induced by killed S. aureus antigen in chickens.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Poultry Science Association.