Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waldenstedt, L
Right arrow Articles by Uggla, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waldenstedt, L
Right arrow Articles by Uggla, A
Poultry Science, Vol 78, Issue 2, 182-189
Copyright © 1999 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Effect of betaine supplement on broiler performance during an experimental coccidial infection

L Waldenstedt, K Elwinger, P Thebo, and A Uggla

Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. Lotta.Waldenstedt@huv.slu.se

A trial was conducted to investigate the effects of betaine as a feed supplement, given singly and in combination with the ionophore coccidiostat narasin, on broiler performance during an experimental coccidial infection. Five hundred and sixty female Ross broiler chickens were kept in floor pens and given a wheat-based diet. At 10 d of age, 420 chickens were individually inoculated with a mixture of Swedish chicken Eimeria isolates containing E. acervtulina, E. praecox, E. maxima, and E. tenella. Remaining birds were kept as uninoculated controls. The effects of betaine (0 or 1.0 g/kg) and narasin (0 or 70 ppm) added to the basal diet were evaluated. Overall, betaine as a single feed supplement improved live weight by 5.7, 5.4, and 5.6% at 22, 29, and 36 d, respectively, but had no positive effect in combination with narasin. A longer withdrawal period of the coccidiostat (10 vs 5 d) did not affect live weight, but significantly increased feed intake by 9.6% and feed conversion ratio by 12.6%, irrespective of betaine supplement. Inoculated birds had a 10% lower live weight than uninoculated chickens. Performance of uninoculated birds was similar to that of inoculated birds treated with narasin, except at 7 d after inoculation, when live weights of uninoculated birds were significantly higher. Chickens given coccidiostat had less Clostridium perfringens in their ceca, but the prevalence was not altered by betaine supplement. There was no difference in intestinal lesion scores between inoculated chickens given coccidiostat or not, despite the better performance of chickens given coccidiostat. Betaine did not affect Eimeria oocyst output or intestinal lesion scores.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Poultry Science Association.