Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnhart, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hargis, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barnhart, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hargis, B.
Poultry Science, Vol 78, Issue 2, 211-214
Copyright © 1999 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Effect of lactose administration in drinking water prior to and during feed withdrawal on Salmonella recovery from broiler crops and ceca

ET Barnhart, DJ Caldwell, MC Crouch, JA Byrd, DE Corrier, and BM Hargis

Department of Poultry Science, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station 77843, USA.

Salmonella contamination of the chicken crop has been reported to increase markedly and significantly during feed withdrawal, probably due to coprophagy, and may contribute to carcass contamination at processing. The effect of prolonged lactose administration (2.5%) in the drinking water on the incidence of Salmonella recovery from broiler crops or ceca was evaluated in seven experiments. In these experiments, all or a percentage (providing seeders and contacts) of 7-wk-old broilers were challenged with approximately 1 x 108 cfu Salmonella enteritidis and provided lactose for 5 or 11 d prior to and during an 18 or 24 h feed withdrawal period. A small but significant lactose-mediated reduction in Salmonella contamination of crops was observed in one of two identical experiments with 18 h feed withdrawal. Extending the feed withdrawal period to 24 h did not improve the ability of lactose to affect Salmonella recovery from crops or ceca. Similarly, lactose did not affect Salmonella recovery when the percentage of birds challenged was reduced to 3 out of 16 and Salmonella recovery from crops or ceca of unchallenged, contact broilers was measured. Extending the duration of exposure to 2.5% lactose in the drinking water from 5 to 11 d did not improve the ability of lactose to affect Salmonella recovery. Taken together, these data suggest that provision of 2.5% lactose in the drinking water during the last 5 to 11 d of growout prior to slaughter will not be useful in an integrated Salmonella control program under commercial conditions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
A. Torres-Rodriguez, S. E. Higgins, J. L. S. Vicente, A. D. Wolfenden, G. Gaona-Ramirez, J. T. Barton, G. Tellez, A. M. Donoghue, and B. M. Hargis
Effect of Lactose as a Prebiotic on Turkey Body Weight Under Commercial Conditions
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2007; 16(4): 635 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
P. E. Mozdziak, S. Pophal, S. Borwornpinyo, and J. N. Petitte
Transgenic Chickens Expressing {beta}-Galactosidase Hydrolyze Lactose in the Intestine
J. Nutr., October 1, 2003; 133(10): 3076 - 3079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Poultry Science Association.