Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donoghue, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donoghue, A.
Poultry Science, Vol 78, Issue 3, 437-443
Copyright © 1999 by Poultry Science Association

Articles

Prospective approaches to avoid flock fertility problems: predictive assessment of sperm function traits in poultry

AM Donoghue

USDA-ARS, Germplasm and Gamete Physiology Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA. annie@lpsi.barc.usda.gov

This paper discusses why it is important to evaluate males as individuals and how advances made in understanding and measurement of sperm function can be used to improve reproductive efficiency in poultry. Commercial turkey breeding relies on pooling semen from multiple toms. It generally is assumed that sperm in good quality semen from all toms are equally fecund. (Fecund is defined, for males, as an individual whose semen contains a majority of sperm with the potential of producing fertilized eggs, which includes success at all steps in the fertilization process: sperm movement, storage in the hens' sperm storage tubules, binding and penetrating the perivitelline layer, and fertilization.) However, when DNA fingerprinting was used to determine paternity efficiency after pooling ejaculates from seven or more toms, it was found that 18 of 26 males produced very few, or no, offspring. In addition, the traditional measures of poultry semen quality: semen volume, sperm concentration, sperm viability, and subjective motility assessment, were poor predictors of paternity. In recent years, a concentrated effort has been made to develop and evaluate methods that quantify sperm function in poultry. Methods to measure some of these traits are reviewed: sperm motility, sperm storage in the hen, and sperm binding and penetration of the ovum. Data supporting use of these tools for managing flock fertility from the male perspective are explored.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Poult. Sci.Home page
S. J. Liu, J. X. Zheng, and N. Yang
Semen Quality Factor as an Indicator of Fertilizing Ability for Geese
Poult. Sci., January 1, 2008; 87(1): 155 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ReproductionHome page
O Linhart, M Rodina, D Gela, M Kocour, and M Vandeputte
Spermatozoal competition in common carp (Cyprinus carpio): what is the primary determinant of competition success?
Reproduction, November 1, 2005; 130(5): 705 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. M. Donoghue, T. S. Sonstegard, L. M. King, E. J. Smith, and D. W. Burt
Turkey Sperm Mobility Influences Paternity in the Context of Competitive Fertilization
Biol Reprod, August 1, 1999; 61(2): 422 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Poultry Science Association.