Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barbato, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barbato, G.
Poultry Science, Vol 78, Issue 3, 444-452
Copyright © 1999 by Poultry Science Association

Articles

Genetic relationships between selection for growth and reproductive effectiveness

GF Barbato

Department of Poultry Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802, USA. gfb1@psu.edu

The domestic and international poultry industries have gone through many changes over the last 50 yr. One constant in the meat-type poultry industry has been the emphasis on genetic improvement of growth. Using lines from a double, divergent selection experiment, data are presented on the genetic relationships between growth to different ages and reproductive parameters. During the last three generations of selection an in vitro sperm binding assay was used and evaluated for its usefulness in a selection program for growth-related phenotypes. Growth to different ages can have markedly different genetic architecture, compared to evaluating body weight at a fixed age. Growth is a nonlinear phenomenon and should be evaluated as such within the context of a genetics program. Fertility is positively correlated with growth to 14 d of age (EGR14), but negatively correlated with growth to 42 d of age (EGR42). This difference is primarily due to the high, negative correlation between exponential growth from 14 to 42 d of age (EGR14/42) and reproductive phenotypes. Roosters were also evaluated with an in vitro sperm binding assay, which is highly correlated with fertility. The genetic architecture of the sperm binding assay was very similar to that of fertility, with an additive genetic correlation of 0.75. Further, it was shown that culling the worst 25% roosters on the basis of the sperm binding assay would have very little effect on the growth performance of the resulting progeny, yet increased the number of chicks produced per rooster by 10 to 25% (depending upon the population).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Poult. Sci.Home page
H. Romero-Sanchez, P. W. Plumstead, N. Leksrisompong, K. E. Brannan, and J. Brake
Feeding Broiler Breeder Males. 4. Deficient Feed Allocation Reduces Fertility and Broiler Progeny Body Weight
Poult. Sci., April 1, 2008; 87(4): 805 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Poult. Sci.Home page
H. Romero-Sanchez, P. W. Plumstead, N. Leksrisompong, and J. Brake
Feeding Broiler Breeder Males. 2. Effect of Cumulative Rearing Nutrition on Body Weight, Shank Length, Comb Height, and Fertility
Poult. Sci., January 1, 2007; 86(1): 175 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Poultry Science Association.