Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lambooij, E
Right arrow Articles by Dijksterhuis, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lambooij, E
Right arrow Articles by Dijksterhuis, G.
Poultry Science, Vol 78, Issue 4, 600-607
Copyright © 1999 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

The effects of captive bolt and electrical stunning, and restraining methods on broiler meat quality

E Lambooij, C Pieterse, SJ Hillebrand, and GB Dijksterhuis

Institute for Animal Science and Health, ID-DLO, Lelystad, The Netherlands. e.lambooij@id.dlo.nl

The effects of captive bolt stunning using air pressure, compared to electrical water bath stunning, on broiler carcass and meat quality were evaluated. The birds were shackled or placed in a cone. Two trials were conducted using a total of 160 female broilers. The four stunning-restraining treatments were whole-body electrical stunning (10 s, 110 mA, 300 Hz) in a water bath or air pressure stunning (0.5 s, 2 atm) while broilers were shackled by their feet or placed in a cone. Air pressure stunning caused a higher (P < 0.01) degree of convulsions and a lower (P < 0.01) degree of blood loss than electrical stunning, and reduced the prevalence of broken clavicles (P < 0.05) and coracoids (P < 0.01). Blood loss of shackled broilers was slightly higher (P < 0.05) than those restrained in a cone. Air pressure stunning resulted in significantly (P < 0.01) lower pH values and hemorrhaging in filets and thigh muscles than electrical stunning. The incidence of thigh muscle hemorrhaging was significantly (P < 0.01) reduced when broilers were restrained in a cone compared to being shackled. The stunning and restraining treatments did not result in differences in cooking losses. The filets from shackled birds were judged more tender than the filets from cone-restrained birds. With respect to the effect of stunning method, the filets of air pressure stunned birds was judged more tender than the meat from electrically stunned birds. Captive bolt stunning using air pressure has benefits over electrical stunning; however, a suitable stunning and restraining device remains to be developed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
V. Battula, M. W. Schilling, Y. Vizzier-Thaxton, J. M. Behrends, J. B. Williams, and T. B. Schmidt
The Effects of Low-Atmosphere Stunning and Deboning Time on Broiler Breast Meat Quality
Poult. Sci., June 1, 2008; 87(6): 1202 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Poultry Science Association.