Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elston, J.
Right arrow Articles by Scheideler, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elston, J.
Right arrow Articles by Scheideler, S.
Poultry Science, Vol 79, Issue 4, 471-476
Copyright © 2000 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Laying hen behavior. 1. Effects of cage type and startle stimuli

JJ Elston, MM Beck, SD Kachman, and SE Scheideler

Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 68583-0908, USA.

The well-being of commercial laying hens plays an important role in egg production. Behaviors such as pacing, displaced preening, increased aggression, and redirected activities have been associated with stress in poultry. This study was conducted to determine whether two strains of commercial layers, reported to differ in level of excitability, behave differently in two types of commercial cages. DeKalb Delta and Hy-Line W36 hens, 40 to 45 wk of age, were housed six to eight per cage in open or solid-sided cages, at an equal density between cages. For each strain, there were six cages per cage type for a total of 24 cages. In the first five experiments, behavioral data were obtained at a distance of 1 m by instantaneous or scan sampling. These experiments included hen behavior in both types of cages with and without the presence of frustrating or startle conditions. Some significant differences in behavior existed within experiments but not consistently among all experiments. Sampling method did not affect reliability of data collection. Two trials were then conducted to determine whether the length of time to return to normal activity after a startle stimulus is influenced by the cage type or strain. In the first startle experiment, DeKalb hens returned to normal activity more quickly than did Hy-Line hens (P = 0.07); this strain difference was not found when the experiment was repeated. Cage type did not appear to affect the behavior of birds adversely, although neither cage type appeared to confer an advantage. No clear differences were found in behavior by strain or by strain within cage.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
K. Pohle and H.-W. Cheng
Furnished cage system and hen well-being: Comparative effects of furnished cages and battery cages on behavioral exhibitions in White Leghorn chickens
Poult. Sci., August 1, 2009; 88(8): 1559 - 1564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Poultry Science Association.