Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stern, N.
Right arrow Articles by Musgrove, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stern, N.
Right arrow Articles by Musgrove, M.
Poultry Science, Vol 80, Issue 2, 156-160
Copyright © 2001 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Comparison of mucosal competitive exclusion and competitive exclusion treatment to reduce Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. colonization in broiler chickens

NJ Stern, NA Cox, JS Bailey, ME Berrang, and MT Musgrove

United States Department of Agriculture, Poultry Microbiological Safety Research Unit, Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, Athens, Georgia 30605, USA. nstern@saa.ars.usda.gov

Control of Salmonella spp. during the earliest phases of broiler production may provide the best opportunity to reduce human pathogens on processed broiler carcasses. Application of the "Nurmi concept" has been demonstrated to be an effective means in reducing Salmonella colonization among broiler chicks. In 1989, Aho et al. developed a competitive exclusion (CE) culture for control of Salmonella spp., whereas a mucosal competitive exclusion culture (MCE) developed in the United States was originally created to control Campylobacter colonization (Stern et al., 1995). The major differences in the two patents were the higher level of anaerobic culture required, the degree of epithelial scraping and washing of the ceca, media used for subculturing, and the culture incubation temperatures (35 C vs. 42 C). The CE and MCE were compared for efficacy in reducing Salmonella and Campylobacter colonization in broiler chicks. Nine adult birds (three for each of three replicates) were slaughtered, and each of a bird's paired ceca were used to produce corresponding antagonistic microflora, which were administered to day-of-hatch chicks. The chicks (a total of 210) were challenged 24 h later with Salmonella and Campylobacter and were killed 1 wk later, and levels of the pathogens were determined. Ninety CE-treated birds were significantly more colonized by Salmonella typhimurium than those 90 chicks treated with the MCE microflora (3.97 log 10 cfu/g cecal contents vs. 1.25 log 10 cfu/g cecal contents). Also, Campylobacter spp. colonization of these birds was significantly higher for CE-treated birds when compared with MCE-treated birds (6.96 log 10 cfu/g cecal contents vs. 5.03 log 10 cfu/g cecal contents). These results can be useful in developing intervention strategies to reduce chicken colonization by Salmonella and Campylobacter.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
S. F. Al-Zenki, A. Y. Al-Nasser, A. E. Al-Saffar, F. K. Abdullah, M. E. Al-Bahouh, A. S. Al-Haddad, H. Alomirah, and M. Mashaly
Effects of using a chicken-origin competitive exclusion culture and probiotic cultures on reducing Salmonella in broilers
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2009; 18(1): 23 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
J. F. Flint and M. R. Garner
Feeding beneficial bacteria: A natural solution for increasing efficiency and decreasing pathogens in animal agriculture
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2009; 18(2): 367 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. P. Higgins, S. E. Higgins, J. L. Vicente, A. D. Wolfenden, G. Tellez, and B. M. Hargis
Temporal Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria Probiotic Culture on Salmonella in Neonatal Broilers
Poult. Sci., August 1, 2007; 86(8): 1662 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
C. M. Byrne, M. Clyne, and B. Bourke
Campylobacter jejuni adhere to and invade chicken intestinal epithelial cells in vitro
Microbiology, February 1, 2007; 153(2): 561 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
J. Vicente, S. Higgins, L. Bielke, G. Tellez, D. Donoghue, A. Donoghue, and B. Hargis
Effect of Probiotic Culture Candidates on Salmonella Prevalence in Commercial Turkey Houses
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2007; 16(3): 471 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
M. B. Farnell, A. M. Donoghue, F. S. de los Santos, P. J. Blore, B. M. Hargis, G. Tellez, and D. J. Donoghue
Upregulation of oxidative burst and degranulation in chicken heterophils stimulated with probiotic bacteria.
Poult. Sci., November 1, 2006; 85(11): 1900 - 1906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
K. Cole, M. B. Farnell, A. M. Donoghue, N. J. Stern, E. A. Svetoch, B. N. Eruslanov, L. I. Volodina, Y. N. Kovalev, V. V. Perelygin, E. V. Mitsevich, et al.
Bacteriocins reduce campylobacter colonization and alter gut morphology in turkey poults.
Poult. Sci., September 1, 2006; 85(9): 1570 - 1575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
A. J. Grant, C. Coward, M. A. Jones, C. A. Woodall, P. A. Barrow, and D. J. Maskell
Signature-Tagged Transposon Mutagenesis Studies Demonstrate the Dynamic Nature of Cecal Colonization of 2-Week-Old Chickens by Campylobacter jejuni
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., December 1, 2005; 71(12): 8031 - 8041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. A. Jones, K. L. Marston, C. A. Woodall, D. J. Maskell, D. Linton, A. V. Karlyshev, N. Dorrell, B. W. Wren, and P. A. Barrow
Adaptation of Campylobacter jejuni NCTC11168 to High-Level Colonization of the Avian Gastrointestinal Tract
Infect. Immun., July 1, 2004; 72(7): 3769 - 3776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Poultry Science Association.