Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jin, S
Right arrow Articles by Sell, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jin, S
Right arrow Articles by Sell, J.
Poultry Science, Vol 80, Issue 5, 615-620
Copyright © 2001 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Dietary vitamin K1 requirement and comparison of biopotency of different vitamin K sources for young turkeys

S Jin and JL Sell

Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA.

In a preliminary experiment, the inclusion of vitamin K1 (K1) at a dietary level of 0.1 mg/kg was as effective as 1 or 2 mg/kg in reducing plasma prothrombin time (PT). To obtain an estimate of the dietary K1 requirement and to compare the biopotency of different vitamin K sources for poults, three additional experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, an incomplete factorial arrangement of treatments was used in which five dietary concentrations of K1 (0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, or 2.0 mg/kg) were tested and two concentrations of neomycin (0 or 75 mg/L) in drinking water were used in conjunction with 0, 0.1, and 0.5 mg of K1/kg of diet. Thus, we used a total of eight treatments. Each treatment was given to two pens of poults, with eight poults per pen. Prothrombin time and prothrombin concentration (PC) in plasma were not influenced by inclusion of neomycin in drinking water. The K1 requirement was estimated, on the basis of PT and PC, to be 0.099 and 0.13 mg/kg, respectively, in Experiment 1. Dietary K1 concentrations tested in Experiment 2 were 0, 0.08, 0.31, or 0.44 mg/kg. A similar protocol to that of Experiment 1 was used in this experiment. The results of Experiment 2 indicated that the dietary K1 requirement was 0.079 mg, based on the influence of dietary K1 on PT. In Experiment 3, dietary treatments consisted of the equivalent of 0.22, 0.55, or 1.11 microM of menadione equivalent/kg from vitamin K1, menadione dimethypyrimidinol bisulfite (MPB) or menadione nicotinamide bisulfite (MNB), respectively, and a control without supplementation of any vitamin K source. The results of Experiment 3 showed that the biopotency of K1 was greater than that of MPB or MNB. The biopotencies of MPB and MNB were similar, although MNB was more potent in reducing plasma PT when supplemented at the level of 0.1 mg of menadione/kg. A nadir of PT and a plateau of PC were evident with a dietary supplementation of MPB or MNB at a level of 0.25 mg of menadione/kg. Results of this research show that the dietary K1 requirement of young turkeys is in the range of 0.079 to 0.13 mg/kg, and ingestion of neomycin did not affect estimates of the requirement. The biopotency of vitamin K1 in reducing plasma PT and increasing plasma PC was greater than that of MPB or MNB. The biopotency of MNB was greater than that of MPB when menadione supplementation was equivalent to 0.10 mg of K1/kg.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Poultry Science Association.