Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huff, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rath, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huff, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rath, N.
Poultry Science, Vol 80, Issue 9, 1305-1313
Copyright © 2001 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Effect of early handling of turkey poults on later responses to a dexamethasone-Escherichia coli challenge. 1. Production values and physiological response

GR Huff, WE Huff, JM Balog, and NC Rath

USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Poultry Science Center, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, USA. grhuff@uark.edu

The stress responses of mice and rats has been shown to be permanently altered by brief, gentle handling during the first 10 d of life, resulting in increased BW and resistance to stress-induced immunosuppression. The purpose of this study was to determine whether early handling of turkey poults could permanently affect production values and physiology of adult turkeys. Turkey poults were handled 0, 1 (1x), or 2 (2x) times daily for the first 10 d after hatch. Handling consisted of gently catching each poult and holding it for 10 s. On Day 11 after hatch, half of the birds from each handling treatment were treated with three injections of 2 mg dexamethasone (DEX)/kg BW on alternating days. On the day of the third DEX injection, duplicate pens of birds were also inoculated in the airsac with 0 or 50 cfu of Escherichia coli. The same birds were treated with a second series of DEX injections at 5 wk of age. Two weeks later, all birds were weighed, and 3 wk later four birds per pen were bled and 10 birds per pen were necropsied; relative organ weights were then determined. Surviving birds were treated with a third series of DEX injections at 10 wk of age; 2 wk later, all surviving turkeys were bled, weighed, and necropsied. Feed consumption was determined weekly. There were no differences due to handling treatment on the body weights or on the relative organ weights of birds that died after the first DEX treatment. Birds treated with a second DEX injection at 5 wk of age and handled 1x daily had decreased BW. Those handled 1x or 2x daily had higher feed conversion ratios. Surviving birds that were given a third DEX treatment had higher BW and no difference in feed conversion when handled 1x or 2x daily. Relative liver, heart, and spleen weights were affected by handling of DEX-E. coli-treated birds, as were serum chemistry values for calcium, iron, glucose, total protein, blood urea nitogen, uric acid, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and gamma-glutamyltransferase. Handling also affected the numbers of white blood cells of DEX-treated birds. These results indicate that brief and gentle handling of turkey poults during the first 10 d after hatch has lasting effects on production values and physiology of adult turkeys and that these effects can be positive or negative. These results suggest a genetic divergence in the response to stress and its effect on production values and physiology of commercial turkey populations.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
G. Huff, W. Huff, N. Rath, A. Donoghue, N. Anthony, and K. Nestor
Differential Effects of Sex and Genetics on Behavior and Stress Response of Turkeys
Poult. Sci., July 1, 2007; 86(7): 1294 - 1303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Poultry Science Association.