Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crouch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Krueger, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crouch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Krueger, K.
Poultry Science, Vol 81, Issue 1, 9-15
Copyright © 2002 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Effect of physical feed restriction during rearing on large white turkey breeder hens: 1. Growth performance

AN Crouch, JL Grimes, VL Christensen, and KK Krueger

British United Turkeys of America, Lewisburg, West Virginia 24901, USA.

Large White turkey breeder hens were fed ad libitum (CC), feed-restricted from 16 to 24 wk (CR), feed-restricted from 3 to 16 wk (RC), or feed-restricted from 3 to 24 wk (RR). Feed restriction was implemented so that RC and RR hens achieved a 45% reduction in BW compared to CC hens at 16 wk. From 16 to 24 wk, feed was allotted to RR and CR hens to maintain a slight increase in BW. At the completion of each restriction period, hens were gradually released back to ad libitum feeding. At 30 wk of age, hens were photostimulated for a 20-wk summer season egg production cycle. Mean BW for all treatments were different (P < or = 0.05) at 16 and 30 wk. At the end of lay, hens on treatment CR were not different in BW from treatment CC hens, and treatment RR hens were not different in BW from treatment RC hens. Hens on treatment RR had the greatest BW gain and feed consumption leading into the production cycle. All treatment hens lost BW from the time of first egg until 47 wk of age. Hens on treatment CC lost significantly (P < or = 0.05) more relative BW (%) than those in any other treatment. Coefficient of variation for flock uniformity was similar for all treatments at time of photostimulation. At the end of the study, cumulative feed consumption was significantly less for restricted treatments: 86.5, 83.1, 75.8, and 70.7 kg/hen for treatments CC, CR, RC, and RR, respectively.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Poultry Science Association.