Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diaz, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diaz, G.
Poultry Science, Vol 81, Issue 10, 1492-1495
Copyright © 2002 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Evaluation of the efficacy of a feed additive to ameliorate the toxic effects of 4,15-diacetoxiscirpenol in growing chicks

GJ Diaz

Laboratorio de Toxicologia, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, DC. dgjdiaz@veterinaria.unal.edu.co

The possible protective effect of a feed additive (Mycofix) against the toxic effects of 4,15-diacetoxiscirpenol (DAS) in growing broiler chickens was investigated in a 21-d fully randomized trial consisting of seven dietary treatments (control with no DAS or Mycofix added, 1 ppm DAS alone, 1 ppm DAS supplemented with 0.75 g/kg Mycofix, 1 ppm DAS supplemented with 1.5 g/kg Mycofix, 2 ppm DAS alone, 2 ppm DAS supplemented with 0.75 g/kg Mycofix, and 2 ppm DAS supplemented with 1.5 g/kg Mycofix). When no feed additive was included, both levels of dietary DAS significantly decreased BW and feed intake and caused oral lesions, with the effect of 2 ppm DAS being more severe. When 1 ppm DAS was added to the diet, supplementation of Mycofix protected against the adverse effects of DAS on feed intake and BW at both levels of inclusion (0.75 and 1.5 g/kg); however, no protection against oral lesions was obtained by Mycofix supplementation. This finding suggests that the adverse effect of DAS on performance is not due to the oral lesions per se but it is likely the result of the systemic absorption of the mycotoxin. When 2 ppm dietary DAS was present in the diet, only partial protection on BW and feed intake was obtained by Mycofix supplementation. More studies are required to determine if a higher dose of Mycofix could be capable of counteracting the adverse effects of 2 ppm dietary DAS on chicken performance.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Poultry Science Association.