Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, F
Right arrow Articles by Roush, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, F
Right arrow Articles by Roush, W.
Poultry Science, Vol 81, Issue 2, 182-192
Copyright © 2002 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Multiple-objective (goal) programming model for feed formulation: an example for reducing nutrient variation

F Zhang and WB Roush

Department of Poultry Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802-3501, USA.

A multiple-objective programming (MOP) model was applied to the feed formulation process with the objectives of minimizing nutrient variance and minimizing ration cost. A MOP model was constructed for a broiler grower ration (3 to 6 wk) and formulated with a Microsoft Excel solver. Twenty-one ingredients with 17 nutrients were included in the formulation. Amino acids were based on digestible values. The following objectives were considered as soft constraints: (1) meeting the nutrient requirements; (2) meeting the ingredient restrictions; and (3) meeting nutrient ratios, including calcium to phosphorus and the relationship of amino acids to lysine (ideal amino acid ratios). Hard constraints considered were (1) a least-cost ration and (2) minimal nutrient variances for protein, methionine, and lysine. It was found that (1) the MOP model was more flexible in providing a compromise solution than a traditional feed formulation with a linear program, (2) the MOP model was able to handle several conflicting objectives simultaneously as compared to the traditional linear programming approach that could handle only one objective, and (3) the MOP model gave the best compromise solution that would satisfy multiple decision makers when trade-offs were made between the ration cost and minimum variances of protein and methionine. The MOP model is an efficient tool to assist the decision-making process through solving a series of linear/nonlinear programs and by interacting with decision-makers.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Poultry Science Association.