Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heckert, R.
Right arrow Articles by Pettit-Riley, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heckert, R.
Right arrow Articles by Pettit-Riley, R
Poultry Science, Vol 81, Issue 4, 451-457
Copyright © 2002 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers

RA Heckert, I Estevez, E Russek-Cohen, and R Pettit-Riley

Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Maryland at College Park, 20742, USA. rh175@umail.umd.edu

This study attempted to evaluate the effect of various housing densities and perch availability on the immune status of commercial broilers. Birds were raised from hatch to 42 d of age with 10, 15, and 20 birds/m2 in pens, with and without the availability of horizontal perches. The immune parameters that were assessed were lymphoid organ weights, antibody response to SRBC in the last 10 d of growth, heterophil:lymphocyte ratios at 32 and 42 d of age, and lymphocyte blastogenesis of peripheral blood lymphocytes collected at 32 and 42 d of age. As density increased, bursa weight and bursa/body weight ratios decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Addition of perches to the pens also significantly decreased the bursa weights and bursa/body weight index (P < 0.01). No other significant effects were observed for the flock performance, morphometric data, or immunological tests between treatments. We concluded that under the conditions of this study, which tried to simulate commercial conditions, the bursal weight was the best indicator of stress that was related to housing density. Addition of perches appeared to increase this level of stress because the birds used the perches infrequently, and therefore there might have been a further reduction in the availability of floor space to the birds.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
D. Xie, Z. X. Wang, Y. L. Dong, J. Cao, J. F. Wang, J. L. Chen, and Y. X. Chen
Effects of Monochromatic Light on Immune Response of Broilers
Poult. Sci., August 1, 2008; 87(8): 1535 - 1539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
I. Estevez
Density Allowances for Broilers: Where to Set the Limits?
Poult. Sci., June 1, 2007; 86(6): 1265 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Poultry Science Association.