Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Urdaneta-Rincon, M
Right arrow Articles by Leeson, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Urdaneta-Rincon, M
Right arrow Articles by Leeson, S
Poultry Science, Vol 81, Issue 5, 679-688
Copyright © 2002 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction on growth characteristics of male broiler chickens

M Urdaneta-Rincon and S Leeson

Department of Animal & Poultry Science, University of Guelph, ON, Canada.

Four experiments were conducted to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative feed restriction on the performance of male broiler chickens. In the first experiment, broilers fed identical pelleted diets were feed-restricted from 5 to 42 d by giving 95, 90, or 85% of the feed consumed ad libitum by control birds the previous day. In a second experiment, broilers were fed pellet or mash diets from 1 to 7 wk. In Experiments 3 and 4, broilers were feed-restricted to 90% of the ad libitum intake of a control group during different intervals. Results from Experiment 1 indicated that live body weight at 42 d was significantly different between unrestricted and restricted broilers (P < 0.01). A reduction in mortality was noted when feed intake was reduced (P < 0.05). In the second experiment, broilers fed mash had lower body weights and breast meat yields at 42 and 49 d (P < 0.05). Cumulative mortality at 42 and 49 d was reduced in broilers fed mash (P < 0.05). Results from Experiment 3 indicated that body weight and mortality were not significantly different (P > 0.05) at 42 d across treatments. There was a significant (P < 0.01) linear improvement on feed conversion at 42 d due to duration of feed restriction. Breast meat yield at 42 d was less in broilers subjected to mild feed restriction (P > 0.05) (Experiments 3 and 4). Broilers appeared able to recover from mild feed restriction, and there was always an associated reduction in mortality.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
O. Cangar, J.-M. Aerts, E. Vranken, and D. Berckmans
Effects of Different Target Trajectories on the Broiler Performance in Growth Control
Poult. Sci., November 1, 2008; 87(11): 2196 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
O. Cangar, J.-M. Aerts, E. Vranken, and D. Berckmans
Online Growth Control as an Advance in Broiler Farm Management
Poult. Sci., March 1, 2007; 86(3): 439 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
C. A. Fassbinder-Orth and W. H. Karasov
Effects of Feed Restriction and Realimentation on Digestive and Immune Function in the Leghorn Chick
Poult. Sci., August 1, 2006; 85(8): 1449 - 1456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Poultry Science Association.