Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dalloul, R.
Right arrow Articles by Doerr, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dalloul, R.
Right arrow Articles by Doerr, J.
Poultry Science, Vol 82, Issue 1, 62-66
Copyright © 2003 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Enhanced mucosal immunity against Eimeria acervulina in broilers fed a Lactobacillus-based probiotic

RA Dalloul, HS Lillehoj, TA Shellem, and JA Doerr

Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.

The effect of feeding a Lactobacillus-based probiotic on intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) subpopulations and subsequent protection against coccidiosis was investigated in broiler chickens. Day-old male broilers were fed standard rations without control (CONT) or with a commercial probiotic (PROB) Primalac. Differences in IEL subpopulations were assessed by flow cytometry at 21 d postprobiotic treatment. At 25 d of age, a group of randomly selected birds from each diet was inoculated orally with 10,000 (per bird) sporulated oocysts of Eimeria acervulina and kept on the same diets. Fecal material, sera, and intestinal washes were collected 10 d postchallenge with E. acervulina. Birds on the PROB diet had more IEL expressing the surface markers CD3, CD4, CD8, and alphabetaTCR than those of the CONT diet. The probiotic-fed chickens produced less oocysts (P < 0.0001) compared to the untreated, control group (368 x 10(6) in CONT vs. 89 x 10(6) in PROB). The interferon-gamma levels in both serum and intestinal secretions were not significantly different between the two groups. However, CONT group showed higher antibody levels against a recombinant coccidial antigen in the intestinal secretions than the PROB group. No significant difference was found in serum antibody levels against the same antigen. These results dearly indicate that the probiotic bacteria impacted the local immune response as characterized by altered IEL subpopulations and increased the birds' resistance to E. acervulina as reflected by reduced oocyst shedding.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. Lessard, M. Dupuis, N. Gagnon, E. Nadeau, J. J. Matte, J. Goulet, and J. M. Fairbrother
Administration of Pediococcus acidilactici or Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii modulates development of porcine mucosal immunity and reduces intestinal bacterial translocation after Escherichia coli challenge
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2009; 87(3): 922 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. T. Brisbin, J. Gong, C. A. Lusty, P. Sabour, B. Sanei, Y. Han, P. E. Shewen, and S. Sharif
Influence of In-Feed Virginiamycin on the Systemic and Mucosal Antibody Response of Chickens
Poult. Sci., October 1, 2008; 87(10): 1995 - 1999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
D. K. Kim, H. S. Lillehoj, Y. H. Hong, D. W. Park, S. J. Lamont, J. Y. Han, and E. P. Lillehoj
Immune-Related Gene Expression in Two B-Complex Disparate Genetically Inbred Fayoumi Chicken Lines Following Eimeria maxima Infection
Poult. Sci., March 1, 2008; 87(3): 433 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. P. Higgins, S. E. Higgins, J. L. Vicente, A. D. Wolfenden, G. Tellez, and B. M. Hargis
Temporal Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria Probiotic Culture on Salmonella in Neonatal Broilers
Poult. Sci., August 1, 2007; 86(8): 1662 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. Parker, E. O. Oviedo-Rondon, B. A. Clack, S. Clemente-Hernandez, J. Osborne, J. C. Remus, H. Kettunen, H. Makivuokko, and E. M. Pierson
Enzymes as Feed Additive to Aid in Responses Against Eimeria Species in Coccidia-Vaccinated Broilers Fed Corn-Soybean Meal Diets with Different Protein Levels
Poult. Sci., April 1, 2007; 86(4): 643 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
K. C. Mountzouris, P. Tsirtsikos, E. Kalamara, S. Nitsch, G. Schatzmayr, and K. Fegeros
Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Probiotic Containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus Strains in Promoting Broiler Performance and Modulating Cecal Microflora Composition and Metabolic Activities
Poult. Sci., February 1, 2007; 86(2): 309 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CVIHome page
H. R. Haghighi, J. Gong, C. L. Gyles, M. A. Hayes, B. Sanei, P. Parvizi, H. Gisavi, J. R. Chambers, and S. Sharif
Modulation of Antibody-Mediated Immune Response by Probiotics in Chickens
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., December 1, 2005; 12(12): 1387 - 1392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Poultry Science Association.