Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eifert, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hackney, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eifert, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hackney, C.
Poultry Science, Vol 82, Issue 12, 1898-1902
Copyright © 2003 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Comparison of sampling techniques for detection of Arcobacter butzleri from chickens

JD Eifert, RM Castle, FW Pierson, CT Larsen, and CR Hackney

Department of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA. jeifert@vt.edu

Arcobacter butzleri is a causative agent of human enteritis that has been recently differentiated from the genus Campylobacter. Previous work suggests that its transmission to humans is likely through a foodborne route with a substantial tendency to be located on poultry carcasses. For reducing the incidence of this pathogen on commercial poultry, improved protocols are needed to sample and identify A. butzleri from infected birds prior to slaughter. The purpose of this study was to compare sampling methods for this emerging pathogen from chickens that were artificially inoculated per os with A. butzleri. We tested three sampling techniques commonly used to determine the microbiological quality of poultry: cloacal swabs, fecal samples, and environmental surface (drag) swabs collected when birds were 3, 5, or 7 wk old. These samples were cultured in Johnson-Murano enrichment broth and analyzed by PCR. Results indicate that environmental surface swabs yielded the highest recovery percentage. A detection rate of 75 to 100% was observed for each sampling period (age of chicken). Additionally, A. butzleri could not be isolated from the intestinal tract (jejunum, ileum, cecum, colorectum) of inoculated birds.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
E. Van Driessche and K. Houf
Discrepancy Between the Occurrence of Arcobacter in Chickens and Broiler Carcass Contamination
Poult. Sci., April 1, 2007; 86(4): 744 - 751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Poultry Science Association.