Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bar, A
Right arrow Articles by Vax, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bar, A
Right arrow Articles by Vax, E
Poultry Science, Vol 82, Issue 4, 543-550
Copyright © 2003 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Alternative procedures for molt induction: practical aspects

A Bar, V Razaphkovsky, D Shinder, and E Vax

Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel. ariebar@agri.gov.il

Shortening daylight (to 10.5 to 11 h/d) slightly reduced the rest period (the interval between last egg and first clutch), whereas feeding a low-protein diet during the 22-d period following 8 d of feed withdrawal (FW) (recovery period) markedly extended it. Feed withdrawal accompanied by a short-daylight regime and a long recovery period led to the best postmolt production. However, production per hen housed during the whole experimental period was only slightly increased. Thus, a long rest period may mask the positive effects of short daylight and recovery diet. At least 140 to 170 d were needed to enable the molted hens to compensate for the loss of eggs during the rest period. Therefore, under certain economic conditions, rearing of nonmolting hens for 640 to 700 d should be an economic consideration. Ten days of feeding of a diet containing 0.06% nicarbazin (NICR) arrested egg production and caused a 22-d rest period but not a typical molt. Few variables of production or shell quality were improved by NICR but to a lesser extent than by FW or Zn feeding. Five days of feeding on a high-Zn diet (20 g Zn/kg; HZn) improved postmolt performances similarly to FW. Ten days of feeding on a modest-Zn (2.8 g Zn/kg), low-Ca, and low-P diet (Zn-CaP) affected postmolt performances inconsistently. In one out of two trials (trial 2), the effects of Zn-CaP were similar to those of FW or HZn; in the other (trial 3), the effects were less pronounced, more time was required for egg arrest, and more eggs were laid occasionally during the rest period. In trial 2, only the Zn-CaP diet was accompanied by short daylight. In both trials, feed intake during the induction period was only slightly reduced. Zn feeding increased the yolk Zn content slightly in eggs laid during the induction period and at the onset of production. In trial 2, only Zn-CaP markedly increased yolk Zn of eggs laid during the first 5 d of production.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
G. Wu, P. Gunawardana, M. Bryant, R. Voitle, and D. Roland
Effect of Molting Method and Dietary Energy on Postmolt Performance of Two Strains of Single Comb White Leghorn Hens
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 1 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
W. K. Kim, L. M. Donalson, S. A. Bloomfield, H. A. Hogan, L. F. Kubena, D. J. Nisbet, and S. C. Ricke
Molt Performance and Bone Density of Cortical, Medullary, and Cancellous Bone in Laying Hens During Feed Restriction or Alfalfa-Based Feed Molt
Poult. Sci., September 1, 2007; 86(9): 1821 - 1830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
G. Wu, P. Gunawardana, M. M. Bryant, R. A. Voitle, and D. A. Roland Sr.
Effect of Molting Method and Dietary Energy on Postmolt Performance, Egg Components, Egg Solid, and Egg Quality in Bovans White and Dekalb White Hens During Second Cycle Phases Two and Three
Poult. Sci., May 1, 2007; 86(5): 869 - 876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Poultry Science Association.