Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, F.
Right arrow Articles by Ricke, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, F.
Right arrow Articles by Ricke, S.
Poultry Science, Vol 82, Issue 4, 613-617
Copyright © 2003 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Observations on the history of the development of antimicrobials and their use in poultry feeds

FT Jones and SC Ricke

Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, USA. ftjones@uark.edu

Antimicrobials are powerful tools, but controversy and conflict often follow power. The development of antimicrobials was marked by personal attacks, political intrigue, internal conflicts, and lawsuits. Such controversy and conflict has continued. The early history of supplementing animal feeds with antimicrobials parallels the isolation and identification of vitamin B12. Vitamin B12 was isolated and characterized in 1948, but further research showed that several feed ingredients, including dried mycelia of certain fungi, were more potent as growth promoters in the diet of chicks than was vitamin B12 alone. The growth-promoting component in fungal mycelia was shown to have antimicrobial activity. A total of 32 antimicrobial compounds are approved for use in broiler feeds in the U.S. without a veterinary prescription. Fifteen compounds are listed for treatment of coccidiosis, 11 are listed as growth promotants, and six are listed for other purposes. Seven compounds are also used in human medicine. These compounds include bacitracin, chlotetracycline, erythromycin, lincomycin, novobiocin, oxytetracycline, and penicillin. No published estimates of antimicrobial use in animals exist at present, and estimates of that use differ markedly. The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) estimates usage at 30.6 million pounds, nearly 50% (49.85%) higher than the Animal Health Institute (AHI) estimate of 20.42 million pounds. AHI surveyed their members (the manufacturers of antimicrobials) to obtain their estimates, whereas USC calculated their estimates using published data and the following general formula: antimicrobial use = number of animals treated x average days treated x average dose.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. I. R. Castanon
History of the Use of Antibiotic as Growth Promoters in European Poultry Feeds
Poult. Sci., November 1, 2007; 86(11): 2466 - 2471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
M. E. Berrang, S. R. Ladely, R. J. Meinersmann, and P. J. Fedorka-Cray
Subtherapeutic Tylosin Phosphate in Broiler Feed Affects Campylobacter on Carcasses During Processing
Poult. Sci., June 1, 2007; 86(6): 1229 - 1233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Poultry Science Association.