Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuhnlein, U
Right arrow Articles by Aggrey, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuhnlein, U
Right arrow Articles by Aggrey, S.
Poultry Science, Vol 82, Issue 6, 876-881
Copyright © 2003 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

The dynamics of the genotype-phenotype association

U Kuhnlein, R Parsanejad, D Zadworny, and SE Aggrey

Department of Animal Science, McGill University, Ste. Anne de Bellevue, QC, Canada H9X 3V9. Urs.Kuhnlein@mcgill.ca

The integrity of an organism is maintained by networks of interacting genes. Such networks predict that genetic variants affect phenotypes in a nonadditive fashion. That is, the effect of an allelic variation in one gene is dependent on the variations in other genes. We summarize the analyses of a series of genes in a White Leghorn strain that support the existence of such gene networks: 1) genes are pleiotropic, 2) genes affect trait correlations, 3) genes affect trait distributions in a nonadditive fashion, 4) genes interact with each other, and 5) genes are at linkage disequilibrium, even when located on different chromosomes. The latter observation indicated that certain gene combinations lead to reduced reproductive fitness. Each candidate genes we analyzed segregated for multiple alleles that affected production traits. This finding was surprising, even for a strain with a large effective population size. The shapes of trait distributions appear to be a better descriptor of gene effects than measures of central tendency. Despite this complexity, it is feasible to conduct DNA-based selection, starting from any of several different genes that affect a trait. Gene networks may be altered in many different ways to improve a particular phenotype, but networks may differ in their effects on other traits.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. W. Podlich, C. R. Winkler, and M. Cooper
Mapping As You Go: An Effective Approach for Marker-Assisted Selection of Complex Traits
Crop Sci., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1560 - 1571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Poultry Science Association.