Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keeling, L.
Right arrow Articles by Correia, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keeling, L.
Right arrow Articles by Correia, M.
Poultry Science, Vol 82, Issue 9, 1393-1396
Copyright © 2003 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Production-related traits of layers reared in different sized flocks: the concept of problematic intermediate group sizes

LJ Keeling, I Estevez, RC Newberry, and MG Correia

Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 234, SE 532 23, Skara, Sweden. Linda.Keeling@hmh.slu.se

Laying hens were reared from 1 d of age in four replicates each of four different group sizes: 15, 30, 60, and 120 birds. To maintain stocking density at a constant 5 birds/m2, they were housed in litter floor pens of 3, 6, 12, and 24 m2, respectively. The allocation of feeder space, drinker nipples, and perch space was also constant per bird, irrespective of group size, as was the arrangement of resources in the pens. Birds were individually weighed at 3, 7, 12, 15, and 18 wk of age, and comb length and height were measured with calipers. At 24 and 39 wk, a sample of 30 eggs from each pen was weighed to determine mean egg weight. Results show a significant effect of group size on BW, with birds in the groups of 30 and 120 being lighter than birds in groups of 15 and 60. Eggs from birds in groups of 30 were significantly smaller than those from birds in the other group sizes. Comb size was unaffected by group size. We propose that these results support the theory that the hierarchical social structure based on individual recognition in small groups breaks down in large groups as birds become less aggressive and more tolerant. The results suggest that this transition occurs at a group size of around 30 birds, and that this 'intermediate' group size presents social problems for birds which, in turn, has consequences for production. The practical implication of this research is to avoid keeping birds in flocks of this size.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
R. L. Dennis, R. C. Newberry, H.-W. Cheng, and I. Estevez
Appearance Matters: Artificial Marking Alters Aggression and Stress
Poult. Sci., October 1, 2008; 87(10): 1939 - 1946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
B. J. Mtileni, K. A. Nephawe, A. E. Nesamvuni, and K. Benyi
The Influence of Stocking Density on Body Weight, Egg Weight, and Feed Intake of Adult Broiler Breeder Hens
Poult. Sci., August 1, 2007; 86(8): 1615 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Poultry Science Association.