Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, L.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, L.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D.
Poultry Science, Vol 83, Issue 1, 119-122
Copyright © 2004 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Moisture retention by water- and air-chilled chicken broilers during processing and cutup operations

LL Young and DP Smith

Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Box 5677, Athens, Georgia 30604-5677, USA. lyoung@saa.ars.usda.gov

The objective of this study was to evaluate effects of storage and cutting on moisture retention by air- and water-chilled broiler chickens. Sixty-four broilers were slaughtered, chilled by cold air or immersion in water, stored over night, cut into fore- and hindquarters, and then stored an additional 24 h. Air chilling conditions were 4 degrees C with air velocity of 2.2 m3/min. Water chilling conditions were 1 degree C with mechanical agitation. Moisture absorption and retention were observed as weight changes throughout the process. Air-chilled carcasses lost an average of 0.68% of their postslaughter weight in storage prior to cutting but lost no more during cutting or postcutting storage. The water-chilled carcasses absorbed 11.7% moisture in chilling but retained 6.98% through precutting storage, 6.00% through cutting and 3.90% through postcutting storage. These data offer baseline values for use in complying with new USDA processing standards.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
C. D. Carroll and C. Z. Alvarado
Comparison of Air and Immersion Chilling on Meat Quality and Shelf Life of Marinated Broiler Breast Fillets
Poult. Sci., February 1, 2008; 87(2): 368 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
R. Huezo, D. P. Smith, J. K. Northcutt, and D. L. Fletcher
Effect of Immersion or Dry Air Chilling on Broiler Carcass Moisture Retention and Breast Fillet Functionality
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2007; 16(3): 438 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Poultry Science Association.