Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodcock, M.
Right arrow Articles by Latour, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodcock, M.
Right arrow Articles by Latour, M.
Poultry Science, Vol 83, Issue 12, 1940-1943
Copyright © 2004 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

The effects of hen vocalizations on chick feeding behavior

MB Woodcock, EA Pajor, and MA Latour

Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.

The purpose of this study was to determine if playing hen calls at the feeder affects broiler chick productivity and welfare. Hatched chicks (n = 832) were equally placed into 16 pens. Broilers in 8 treated pens received 3 min of hen-feeding calls once each hour during the first 9 d of age; broilers in the other 8 pens received no recorded hen vocalizations during the same period. After d 9, recorded hen vocalizations ceased and all birds were treated identically. Through 9 d of age, chicks receiving recorded hen vocalizations had improved (P < or = 0.05) feed conversion ratios, and these chicks weighed more (139.12+/-1.52 g vs. 133.17+/-1.59 g for control chicks; P < or = 0.01). The behavior data showed that on d 1, 4, and 7, more (P < or = 0.05) chicks receiving recorded hen vocalizations were found within 0.61 m of the speaker than control chicks. Following recorded hen vocalization cessation on d 9, birds and feed were weighed on 17, 24, 31, and 38 d of age, and carcass yield was measured on d 40. There were no differences in BW, feed efficiency, or carcass yield after recorded hen vocalization ceased. These data suggest that after d 9, differences became nonsignificant, corresponding to when recorded hen vocalization stopped. Behavior data demonstrated that chicks appear to be attracted when stimulated with recorded hen vocalizations, thus remaining in close proximity to the speaker. Evidence suggests that hen vocalization improves production and attraction to hen vocalization with known improvements in BW and feed conversion during the first 9 d posthatch.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Poultry Science Association.