Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, F.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, F.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, K.
Poultry Science, Vol 83, Issue 3, 384-391
Copyright © 2004 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Salmonella in commercially manufactured feeds

FT Jones and KE Richardson

Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, USA. ftjones@uark.edu

We collected 886 samples (68 feed ingredient samples, 189 dust samples, and 629 feed samples) from 3 feed mills each of which produced between 100,000 and 400,000 tons of feed a year. Samples were collected on 3 d (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday), during 2 seasons (early spring and summer), and between 0700 and 1700 h approximately once per hour. Samples were collected from 5 locations within each mill: ingredient receiving, at the mixer, at the pellet mill, from pellet coolers, and at load-out. Temperatures were taken of the samples obtained at the pellet mill immediately following collection. All samples were analyzed for Enterobacteriaceae counts (EC) and Salmonella. The data confirm that feed ingredients and dust can be a major source of Salmonella contamination in feed mills. There were no differences (P < 0.05) in the Salmonella contamination rates of samples collected in spring as compared with samples collected in summer. Salmonella contamination rates were observed to be higher in samples collected on Friday compared with samples collected on Monday or Wednesday, an effect that may be management related. Data collected at the pellet mill clearly illustrate the uneven distribution of Salmonella contamination in feed as well as the need for control of dust around the pellet mill. Feed samples (both mash and pellets) contaminated with Salmonella contained significantly higher EC than samples not contaminated with Salmonella. Thus, EC may provide some indication of the likelihood of Salmonella contamination in feed samples.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. R. Callaway, T. S. Edrington, R. C. Anderson, J. A. Byrd, and D. J. Nisbet
Gastrointestinal microbial ecology and the safety of our food supply as related to Salmonella
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E163 - E172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
E. E. O'Dea, G. M. Fasenko, G. E. Allison, D. R. Korver, G. W. Tannock, and L. L. Guan
Investigating the effects of commercial probiotics on broiler chick quality and production efficiency.
Poult. Sci., October 1, 2006; 85(10): 1855 - 1863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Poultry Science Association.