Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hartnell, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hartnell, G.
Poultry Science, Vol 83, Issue 3, 456-461
Copyright © 2004 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Comparison of broiler performance when fed diets containing roundup ready (event RT73), nontransgenic control, or commercial canola meal

ML Taylor, EP Stanisiewski, SG Riordan, MA Nemeth, B George, and GF Hartnell

Monsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, Missouri 63167, USA. Mary.L.Taylor@monsanto.com

A 42-d experiment compared the nutritional value of genetically modified glyphosate-tolerant (Roundup Ready event RT73) canola meal to that of conventional canola meal when fed to rapidly growing Ross x Ross 508 broilers using a randomized complete block design. Five pens of males and 5 pens of females were used in each of 8 canola meal treatments (glyphosate-tolerant, nontransgenic control, and 6 commercial varieties). Broilers (10 birds/pen) were fed approximately 25% wt/wt canola meal during the first 20 d and 20% wt/wt canola meal thereafter. In general, performance response variables for glyphosate-tolerant canola meal were not different (P > 0.05) than those for the nontransgenic and commercial canola meals. Carcass fat pad, breast meat, thighs, legs, and wings (on a percentage basis) were similar across treatments (P > 0.05). Expressed as percentage of live weight, chill weight of the broilers fed diets containing glyphosate-tolerant canola meal was not different from those fed all other diets, but some differences were observed between the nontransgenic control and commercial diets. No major differences were observed in percentage of moisture, protein, and fat in breast or thigh meat (P > 0.05) across treatments. Comparisons of the glyphosate-tolerant canola diet to the population of all other diets (combining sexes) showed no major differences (P > 0.05) in performance, carcass yields, or moisture, protein, and fat in breast and thigh meat. Broilers fed diets containing glyphosate-tolerant canola meal had similar growth performance to birds fed nontransgenic control and commercial canola diets.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. McNaughton, M. Roberts, B. Smith, D. Rice, M. Hinds, C. Sanders, R. Layton, I. Lamb, and B. Delaney
Comparison of Broiler Performance When Fed Diets Containing Event DP-3O5423-1, Nontransgenic Near-Isoline Control, or Commercial Reference Soybean Meal, Hulls, and Oil
Poult. Sci., December 1, 2008; 87(12): 2549 - 2561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. McNaughton, M. Roberts, B. Smith, D. Rice, M. Hinds, J. Schmidt, M. Locke, K. Brink, A. Bryant, T. Rood, et al.
Comparison of Broiler Performance When Fed Diets Containing Event DP-356O43 5 (Optimum GAT), Nontransgenic Near-Isoline Control, or Commercial Reference Soybean Meal, Hulls, and Oil
Poult. Sci., December 1, 2007; 86(12): 2569 - 2581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. L. Cerdeira and S. O. Duke
The Current Status and Environmental Impacts of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops: A Review
J. Environ. Qual., August 9, 2006; 35(5): 1633 - 1658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Poultry Science Association.