Selection for avian immune response: a commercial breeding company challenge

Hy-Line International, Dallas Center, Iowa 50063, USA. jfulton@hyline.com

Selection for immune function in the commercial breeding environment is a challenging proposition for commercial breeding companies. Immune response is only one of many traits that are under intensive selection, thus selection pressure needs to be carefully balanced across multiple traits. The selection environment (single bird cages, biosecure facilities, controlled environment) is a very different environment than the commercial production facilities (multiple bird cages, potential disease exposure, variable environment) in which birds are to produce. The testing of individual birds is difficult, time consuming, and expensive. It is essential that the results of any tests be relevant to actual disease or environmental challenge in the commercial environment. The use of genetic markers as indicators of immune function is being explored by breeding companies. Use of genetic markers would eliminate many of the limitations in enhancing immune function currently encountered by commercial breeding companies. Information on genetic markers would allow selection to proceed without subjecting breeding stock to disease conditions and could be done before production traits are measured. These markers could be candidate genes with known interaction or involvement with disease pathology or DNA markers that are closely linked to genetic regions that influence the immune response. The current major limitation to this approach is the paucity of mapped chicken immune response genes and the limited number of DNA markers mapped on the chicken genome. These limitations should be eliminated once the chicken genome is sequenced.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Cavero, M. Schmutz, H. C. Philipp, and R. Preisinger Breeding to reduce susceptibility to Escherichia coli in layers Poult. Sci., October 1, 2009; 88(10): 2063 - 2068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Adriaansen-Tennekes, E. Decuypere, H. K. Parmentier, and H. F. J. Savelkoul Chicken lines selected for their primary antibody response to sheep red blood cells show differential hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responsiveness to mild stressors Poult. Sci., September 1, 2009; 88(9): 1879 - 1882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Minozzi, D. Guemene, M. Couty, D. Gourichon, F. Minvielle, and M. H. Pinard-van der Laan Circulating Corticosterone Reaction to Restraint and Adrenocorticotropin Hormone Administration in White Leghorns Selected for Immune Response Traits Poult. Sci., November 1, 2008; 87(11): 2225 - 2230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Dennis, H. M. Zhang, and H. W. Cheng Effect of Selection for Resistance and Susceptibility to Viral Diseases on Concentrations of Dopamine and Immunological Parameters in Six-Week-Old Chickens Poult. Sci., December 1, 2006; 85(12): 2135 - 2140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Ye, S. Avendano, J. C. M. Dekkers, and S. J. Lamont Association of twelve immune-related genes with performance of three broiler lines in two different hygiene environments. Poult. Sci., September 1, 2006; 85(9): 1555 - 1569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]