Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korver, D.
Right arrow Articles by Lawes, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Korver, D.
Right arrow Articles by Lawes, K.
Poultry Science, Vol 83, Issue 5, 716-725
Copyright © 2004 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Performance characteristics and economic comparison of broiler chickens fed wheat- and triticale-based diets

DR Korver, MJ Zuidhof, and KR Lawes

Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada. doug.korver@ualberta.ca

The effects of triticale and wheat on broiler (mixed sexes) performance and cost of production were compared. In experiment 1, wheat- and triticale-based diets were fed to 3 strains of broilers (Ross x Ross, Hubbard x Hubbard, and Ross x Hubbard). Each of the diets was provided to 5 cages/strain (n = 10 chicks/cage; 1,273 cm2/bird). Weekly BW, gain, feed consumption, and feed conversion ratio (FCR; g of feed/g of gain) were determined. At 42 d, 4 chicks/pen were shipped to a commercial processing plant. The plucked, eviscerated carcasses were evaluated for carcass traits. Overall, the triticale-fed birds had lower final BW and average daily gain and higher FCR. Eviscerated carcass, thigh, and drum weights were lower, but pectoralis minor as a percentage of carcass weight was greater in triticale-fed birds. In experiment 2, a wheat diet and a diet in which triticale was substituted (by weight) for wheat were provided in a 3-phase feeding program. Each diet was provided to 2 identically-equipped commercial barns housing 17,034 broilers each. Individual BW of a sample of birds were recorded in each barn at 0, 19, 34, and 42 d, corresponding to the beginning and end of each dietary phase. Feed consumption and FCR were calculated for each barn. An analysis of each of the diets was calculated using a broiler chicken production cost model. Final BW, feed consumption, carcass weight at processing, flock uniformity, percentage of Grade A carcasses, and percentage of condemned carcasses were not affected by cereal source. Overall FCR (2.165, 2.036; P = 0.0052), feed cost (dollars 0.617, dollars 0.577/kg live weight; P = 0.0260), and total cost of production (dollars 1.019, dollars 0.972/kg live weight; P = 0.0183) were greater for the triticale than wheat diets, respectively. Triticale would be an economically feasible replacement for wheat in broiler diets when its price is less than or equal to 95% of the cost of wheat, less dollars 18 (Canadian). Increased knowledge of the available nutrient profile of triticale, as well as least-cost feed formulation would likely increase the value of triticale relative to wheat for broilers.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Poultry Science Association.