Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nestor, K.
Right arrow Articles by Velleman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nestor, K.
Right arrow Articles by Velleman, S.
Poultry Science, Vol 83, Issue 7, 1055-1059
Copyright © 2004 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Genetic variation in body weight and egg production in an experimental line selected long term for increased egg production, a commercial dam line, and reciprocal crosses between lines

KE Nestor, JW Anderson, RA Patterson, and SG Velleman

Department of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio 44691, USA. nestor.1@osu.edu

A line (E) of turkeys selected long term (40 generations) for increased egg production was reciprocally crossed with a commercial dam line (BD). The BD line was larger and had better conformation than the E line, but the E line laid more eggs than the BD line. Heterosis was negative and significant for BW at 8, 16, and 20 wk of age (both sexes) and at 50% production (females only). Values for heterosis ranged from -3.1 to -5.5%. Negative heterosis was observed for breast width at 16 wk of age (10.8 and 3.0% for males and females, respectively). Positive heterosis values of 9.2, 10.2, and 11.3% were observed for egg production when based on 84, 120, and 180 d, respectively. Heterosis (-8.2%) was significant for rate of response to stimulatory lighting of 14 h light per day (days from stimulatory lighting to production of first egg). Based on data for a 180-d production period, heterosis was observed in average clutch length (12.6%) and rate of lay [number of eggs laid: (180 - total days broody)] (8.2%) but not in total days lost from broodiness or the effective length of the laying period (180 minus days lost in periods of 5 or more consecutive days at the end of the laying period). The present results along with those in the literature suggest that more heterosis in egg production traits might be expected in crosses of lines exhibiting extreme differences in BW and body conformation. The negative heterosis in BW in the BD and E reciprocal crosses reduces the commercial importance of such a cross to improve egg production.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
K. E. Nestor, J. W. Anderson, R. A. Patterson, and S. G. Velleman
Genetics of growth and reproduction in the turkey. 16. Effect of repeated backcrossing of an egg line to a commercial sire line.
Poult. Sci., September 1, 2006; 85(9): 1550 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Poultry Science Association.