Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reddish, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lilburn, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reddish, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lilburn, M.
Poultry Science, Vol 83, Issue 7, 1067-1071
Copyright © 2004 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

A comparison of growth and development patterns in diverse genotypes of broilers. 1. Male broiler growth

JM Reddish and MS Lilburn

Department of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio 44691, USA.

Selection for breast muscle yield and BW in commercial broilers has resulted in genotypes far different from broilers processed in the past. When comparative studies with commercial lines are conducted, it is often difficult to differentiate between carcass effects resulting from direct genetic selection vs. correlated effects that partially reflect genetic changes in BW. The objective of the present experiment was to compare growth and development characteristics of male broilers from commercial lines exhibiting similar rates of BW gain based on a percentage of 8-wk BW but exhibiting different carcass traits. Male broilers from 2 commercial genotypes exhibiting increased breast muscle yield (A and B) were compared with broilers from a commercial line that was "unimproved" with respect to conformation (C). All birds were fed a commercial-type broiler starter diet throughout the study and were processed at 8 wk of age for carcass comparisons. No differences were observed among lines for breast-free BW or weight of the abdominal fat pad. The absolute and relative weights of pectoralis major and pectoralis minor breast muscles were heavier in lines A and B than C (P < 0.001). Length (C > A > B; P < 0.001), width (B > C >A; P < 0.001), and depth (A = B > C; P < 0.001) of the pectoralis major were different between lines. Drum and thigh weights were heavier in lines A and B than C (P < 0.001). There were genotype differences in tibia length (C > A = B, P < 0.001) and femur length (C > A = B, P < 0.001). The comparison of line C with selected lines A and B, suggested that line C may provide a useful model for studying carcass development between commercial genotypes with similar growth patterns.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Poultry Science Association.