Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Proudman, J.
Right arrow Articles by Siopes, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Proudman, J.
Right arrow Articles by Siopes, T.
Poultry Science, Vol 83, Issue 7, 1199-1202
Copyright © 2004 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Effect of a single short-term reduction in photoperiod on photorefractoriness in turkey hens

JA Proudman and TD Siopes

Biotechnology and Germplasm Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA. JohnP@anri.barc.usda.gov

In a prior study, we reported that a high proportion of hens in a winter-laying flock became relatively photorefractory (rPR) early in the reproductive cyand that successive short-term reductions in photoperiod in such hens each initially depressed egg production but then caused a rebound in rate of lay to briefly exceed that of hens that did not exhibit rPR. The present study was conducted to assess rPR in a summer-laying flock and to determine whether a single short-term reduction in day length early in the reproductive cycle might enhance egg production and delay the onset of absolute photorefractoriness (aPR). Control hens received a photoperiod of 16L:8D throughout the experiment. Experimental hens were photostimulated with 16L:8D, received a reduced (but still stimulatory) photoperiod of 11.5L:12.5D for 2 wk beginning 8 wk after photostimulation, and then were returned to 16L:8D for the remainder of the 23-wk test period. Results showed that a single 2-wk reduction in day length shortly after the hens reached peak egg production did not significantly reduce overall flock egg production, but it also did not improve late-season egg production or retard the onset or incidence of aPR. The incidence of rPR was substantially less in this study than we had observed with a winter-laying flock (32.9 vs. 67.1%), but similar proportions of treated hens exhibited the most severe rPR response (a brief but complete cessation of egg production) in both studies (21.1 vs. 24.0%), and all treated hens that subsequently became aPR had shown this severe rPR response to the test photoperiod. We concluded that a core proportion of hens (approximately one-fifth) exhibited a strong rPR response when presented with a reduced photoperiod early in the reproductive cycle, regardless of season of the year, and that such hens were more likely to subsequently exhibit poor egg production or become aPR than flockmates that did not exhibit rPR. Therefore, some indication of the incidence of rPR early in the lay period may have a predictive value for the overall egg production of the flock.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Poultry Science Association.