Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dennis, R
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dennis, R
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, H.
Poultry Science, Vol 83, Issue 9, 1489-1496
Copyright © 2004 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Behavioral and physiological features of chickens diversely selected for resistance to Avian Disease. 1. Selected inbred lines differ in behavioral and physical responses to social stress

R Dennis, HM Zhang, LD Bacon, I Estevez, and HW Cheng

Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.

To test the hypothesis that genetic variations in response to social stress modulate susceptibility to disease in poultry, aggressive behaviors induced by social stress were measured in chickens of different inbred lines selected for disease resistance (line 63) or susceptibility (lines 72 and 15I5), as well as 2 recombinant congenic strains (B and X). At 15 wk of age, roosters from each genetic line or strain were randomly assigned to pairs for intraline male-male aggression tests (n = 8 per line). Based on the results of the intraline aggression tests, the roosters were divided into 2 groups, winners and losers. At 16 wk of age, the roosters were randomly paired as winners vs. winners and losers vs. losers for interline aggression tests, i.e., line 63 vs. 72 and 15I5; line 73 vs. line 15I5; and strain X vs. strain B. Similarly, at 17 wk of age, line 63 vs. strains X and B, and line 72 vs. strains X and B were tested. The tests were conducted in a novel cage that was similar to their home cages, to provide a neutral space for both roosters being tested. Each pair was videotaped for 15 min. Male-male interaction-induced aggressive behaviors were markedly different among the genetic lines. Compared with roosters of lines 15I5 and 72, line 63 roosters generally showed fewer aggressive behaviors, including aggressive pecks and fights, as well as durations (P < 0.05). Roosters of the recombinant congenic strains X and B, each possessing a unique random 87.5% genome of line 63, exhibited low aggressive behaviors, which were similar or equal to the level of line 63 in both intraline and interline aggression tests (P = 0.05). These results may indicate that some of the gene(s) commonly carried between strains X and B as well as line 63 likely played an important role in governing their lower levels of aggression. The present chicken lines may be used as animal models for investigation of the cellular mechanisms of genetic-environmental interactions on disease resistance and stress responses.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
R. L. Dennis, A. G. Fahey, and H. W. Cheng
Different Effects of Individual Identification Systems on Chicken Well-Being
Poult. Sci., June 1, 2008; 87(6): 1052 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
R. L. Dennis, Z. Q. Chen, and H. W. Cheng
Serotonergic Mediation of Aggression in High and Low Aggressive Chicken Strains
Poult. Sci., April 1, 2008; 87(4): 612 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
R. Dennis, H. M. Zhang, and H. W. Cheng
Effect of Selection for Resistance and Susceptibility to Viral Diseases on Concentrations of Dopamine and Immunological Parameters in Six-Week-Old Chickens
Poult. Sci., December 1, 2006; 85(12): 2135 - 2140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Poultry Science Association.