Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Eerden, E
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Eerden, E
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, B
Poultry Science, Vol 83, Issue 9, 1602-1609
Copyright © 2004 by Poultry Science Association

Articles

Phenotypic selection for residual feed intake and its effect on humoral immune responses in growing layer hens

E Van Eerden, H Van Den Brand, HK Parmentier, MC De Jong, and B Kemp

Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands. Ellen.VanEerden@wur.nl

According to the resource allocation theory, animals have to make a trade-off between resource-demanding life traits to obtain maximal fitness. Artificial selection toward efficient producing farm animals, however, may have created animals that have an impaired ability to divert resources to maintenance processes, such as responding to immune challenges. Residual feed intake (RFI), defined as the difference between observed feed intake (FI) and expected feed intake based on metabolic BW and growth, was used as a measure for feed efficiency. Individual BW and FI of 352 pullets were recorded weekly from 4 until 14 wk of age to estimate RFI. The top 50 efficient R- and the top 50 nonefficient R+ birds were selected. BW and BW gain in both groups were similar. FI and RFI, however, were significantly higher in R+ birds. Thirty animals out of every group were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 treatments: immunization with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), Mycobacterium butyricum, or heat-inactivated Salmonella enteritidis bacteria. Antibody titers against KLH, M. butyricum, or Salmonella lipopolysaccharide did not differ between R+ and R- birds. The antibody titer against Salmonella protein was higher in R+ birds. We concluded that a population of chickens from a commercial breed shows considerable variation in RFI. Specific antibody production against KLH, M. butyricum, and S. enteritidis lipopolysaccharide, however, is not influenced by efficiency in terms of RFI. R+ animals may have a higher level of nonantigen specific antibodies, as indicated by the higher antibody response to Salmonella protein.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Poult. Sci.Home page
R. Dennis, H. M. Zhang, and H. W. Cheng
Effect of Selection for Resistance and Susceptibility to Viral Diseases on Concentrations of Dopamine and Immunological Parameters in Six-Week-Old Chickens
Poult. Sci., December 1, 2006; 85(12): 2135 - 2140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Poult. Sci.Home page
E. Van Eerden, H. Van Den Brand, M. J. W. Heetkamp, E. Decuypere, and B. Kemp
Energy Partitioning and Thyroid Hormone Levels During Salmonella enteritidis Infections in Pullets with High or Low Residual Feed Intake.
Poult. Sci., October 1, 2006; 85(10): 1775 - 1783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Poultry Science Association.