Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hangalapura, B.
Right arrow Articles by Parmentier, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hangalapura, B.
Right arrow Articles by Parmentier, H.
Poultry Science, Vol 84, Issue 10, 1520-1529
Copyright © 2005 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Severe feed restriction enhances innate immunity but suppresses cellular immunity in chicken lines divergently selected for antibody responses

BN Hangalapura, MG Nieuwland, G De Vries Reilingh, J Buyse, H Van Den Brand, B Kemp, and HK Parmentier

Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Basav.Hangalapura@wur.nl

The main aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different levels of feed restriction (FR) on immune responses of chicken lines divergently selected for high (H) and low (L) antibody responses to SRBC. We hypothesized that severe feed restriction suppresses immune responses and the level of immune suppression differs between birds with different genetic background. Therefore, we tested antibody responses, blood lymphocyte proliferative responses, and production of reactive oxygen intermediates (ROI) by Zymosan A-stimulated blood cells in chicken lines maintained on 3 levels of FR. The H line birds had significantly higher antibody responses, higher ROI production, and lower corticosterone (CORT) levels when compared with the L line birds. Feed restriction induced no significant effect on specific antibody responses to either a T helper 1- (Mycobacterium butyricum) or a T helper 2- (keyhole limpet hemocyanin) type antigen. Feed-restricted birds showed a marked reduction in natural antibodies binding lipoteichoic acid, in vitro lymphocyte proliferation in response to stimulation with concanavalin A, BW gain, and relative lymphoid organ weights compared with the birds fed ad libitum. However, FR birds showed a markedly enhanced ROI production, and plasma CORT levels compared with the birds fed ad libitum. The enhanced ROI production and suppressed lymphocyte proliferation coinciding with enhanced plasma CORT levels suggest stress-mediated immunomodulating effects of FR. A significant treatment by line interaction was found for ROI production; the increase of ROI production was larger in the H line than in the L line under severe FR. The increase in CORT levels was larger in the L line than in the H line under severe FR. Furthermore, the L line gained more BW than the H line under ad libitum conditions. Finally, under severe FR, relative spleen weight was lower in the L line than in the H line. The present findings suggest genetic differences affecting physiological and immunological responses under FR conditions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
G. Minozzi, D. Guemene, M. Couty, D. Gourichon, F. Minvielle, and M. H. Pinard-van der Laan
Circulating Corticosterone Reaction to Restraint and Adrenocorticotropin Hormone Administration in White Leghorns Selected for Immune Response Traits
Poult. Sci., November 1, 2008; 87(11): 2225 - 2230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
L. Star, M. G. B. Nieuwland, B. Kemp, and H. K. Parmentier
Effect of Single or Combined Climatic and Hygienic Stress on Natural and Specific Humoral Immune Competence in Four Layer Lines
Poult. Sci., September 1, 2007; 86(9): 1894 - 1903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Poultry Science Association.