Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez-Esquerra, R
Right arrow Articles by Leeson, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez-Esquerra, R
Right arrow Articles by Leeson, S
Poultry Science, Vol 84, Issue 10, 1562-1569
Copyright © 2005 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Effects of acute versus chronic heat stress on broiler response to dietary protein

R Gonzalez-Esquerra and S Leeson

Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Two experiments were conducted to determine broiler response to dietary protein during short (1 wk) or prolonged (>3 wk) heat stress (HS). In experiment 1, 21-d-old birds were kept at 20.3 degrees C (thermoneutral; TN), 27.3 degrees C (medium temperature; MT), or 31.4 degrees C (high temperature; HT) and fed diets with 18, 20, 23, or 26% CP for 21 d. Each treatment consisted of 2 blocks of 3 replicates of 15 birds. In experiment 2, broilers were fed diets with 18 or 26% CP or fed ad libitum 2 diets with 10 or 30% CP. Birds were kept at TN (23.5 degrees C) or slowly introduced to HS from 7 to 14 d of age and kept at HT thereafter (chronic; CHS; 29.4 degrees C), and a third group was moved to HT at 21 d (acute HS; AHS; 29.4 degrees C). There were 16 replicates of 4 chickens per treatment distributed in 2 blocks. Performance, body composition, and protein deposition were ascertained from 21 to 28 d and from 28 to 42 d (short and prolonged exposures, respectively). Feeding high protein diets in experiment 1 resulted in linear improvements in body weight gain and feed:gain (P < 0.001) for MT and HT birds, whereas TN birds exhibited a linear (P < 0.001) response to protein. Feed intake declined as CP increased for HT birds during the third week of the study (P < 0.05). In trial 2, better performance was always observed in TN birds. HS depressed performance, although feeding high CP partially ameliorated this effect under AHS and CHS. Regardless of temperature, choice-fed birds selected high protein diets (mean 25.6% CP) and performed similarly to those fed 26% CP. CHS birds showed similar performance to those under AHS. Efficiency of protein deposition was unaffected (P > 0.05). Level of HS and duration of hyperthermia may determine the response of birds to dietary protein. Discrepancies between the 2 studies in response of birds to protein found after prolonged exposure to HS are discussed in view of the differences in levels of certain amino acids used within each experiment.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Poultry Science Association.