Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schinckel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Einstein, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schinckel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Einstein, M.
Poultry Science, Vol 84, Issue 2, 256-264
Copyright © 2005 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Evaluation of alternative nonlinear mixed effects models of duck growth

AP Schinckel, O Adeola, and ME Einstein

Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA. aschinck@purdue.edu

Two nonlinear growth functions were evaluated on 6 groups of 32 ducks. Ducks were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 dietary treatments and weighed weekly from 1 to 43 d of age. The Weibull function had the form: BW(it) = A - (A - B) exp - [(C - 1)/C] (t/IP)**C, where BW(it) is the BW of the ith duck at age t in days and A, B, C, and IP are fixed parameters. The variable A represents mature BW and the variable IP is the age (inflection point) at which maximum average daily gain is achieved. The addition of a single random effect to the Weibull growth function (ip), in which the age to reach the BW at the overall population inflection point of each duck varies, provided a substantially better fit than any other alternative fixed or mixed models. Overall, the Weibull function under-predicted the d-1 BW (46.7 vs. 55.1 g, P < 0.05) and over-predicted the d-8 BW (233.6 vs. 211.7 g, P < 0.05). The predicted BW from d 15 to 43 was very close to the actual mean BW at each age. This model predicts that the between-duck variance in BW increases with age and that the CV increases from 1 to 8 d of age, reaches a plateau from 15 to 22 d of age, and then slowly declines. This mixed effects model predicts the mean age and approximate variation in age that ducks require to reach a specific BW, and is easily adaptable to stochastic modeling.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
S. E. Aggrey
Logistic nonlinear mixed effects model for estimating growth parameters
Poult. Sci., February 1, 2009; 88(2): 276 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Poultry Science Association.