Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Proudman, J.
Right arrow Articles by Siopes, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Proudman, J.
Right arrow Articles by Siopes, T.
Poultry Science, Vol 84, Issue 6, 942-946
Copyright © 2005 by Poultry Science Association

Articles

Thyroid hormone and prolactin profiles in male and female turkeys following photostimulation

JA Proudman and TD Siopes

Biotechnology and Germplasm Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA. JohnP@anri.barc.usda.gov

The turkey hen, a photosensitive bird, will become photorefractory (PR) during the reproductive cycle and will cease laying despite a stimulatory day length. This response is thought to be "programmed" by hormonal events early in the reproductive cycle. The turkey tom, in contrast, produces semen for extended periods and has not been shown to exhibit PR. We compared hormone profiles following photostimulation of hens and toms to assess differences that might program one, but not the other, for PR. We photostimulated with 16 h light per day and measured plasma prolactin (PRL), thyroxine (T4), and triiodothyronine (T3) weekly for 12 wk, and again at 16 and 22 wk. Hens were fed ad libitum, and toms were moderately feed-restricted. Results showed increasing PRL levels following photostimulation in hens, with peak levels occurring at about the time of peak egg production, and declining thereafter. Toms maintained significantly lower concentrations of PRL (P < 0.0001) than hens after 2 wk of photostimulation. A highly significant sex by time interaction in plasma T3 levels was observed due to extreme fluctuations in males. Similar, often reciprocal, fluctuations in mean T4 concentrations also occurred in males. We recycled the toms and repeated blood collections under identical conditions, but with ad libitum feeding to determine if feed restriction may have produced these unusual results. This study revealed an initial significant decline in plasma T3 levels and an increase in T4 levels immediately following photostimulation, and then steady (T4) or slowly rising (T3) levels through 12 wk photostimulation. We conclude that PRL profiles of toms and hens differ markedly during the reproductive cycle, lending support to the suggestion that rising PRL may mediate the onset of PR. Further study is needed to determine if the low plasma T3 levels in males may be related to delayed PR. The extreme fluctuations in plasma T3 and T4 levels of toms receiving relatively mild feed restriction suggest a need for further study of the metabolic effects of feed restriction in turkeys.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Poult. Sci.Home page
J. A. Proudman and T. D. Siopes
Potential Role of Thyroid Hormones and Prolactin in the Programming of Photorefractoriness in Turkey Hens
Poult. Sci., August 1, 2006; 85(8): 1457 - 1461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Poultry Science Association.