Effects of dietary phosphorus, phytase, and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on performance of broiler chickens grown in floor pens

Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA. rangel@umd.edu

Three 49-d experiments (Exp 1, 2, and 3) with broilers in floor pens were conducted to test the applicability of nonphytin phosphorus (NPP) requirements and the NPP-sparing effect of phytase (PHY) and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25D) determined previously in battery Exp. Six dietary NPP treatments were tested using a 4-phase feeding program. Treatments 1 to 6 were NRC (1994) NPP (C); University of Maryland (UMD) NPP; UMD NPP - 0.064% (UMD+PHY); UMD NPP - 0.09% (UMD+PHY+25D); NRC - 0.10% (C+PHY), and 90% UMD NPP (NC), respectively. Treatments 3, 4, and 5 had 600 U of PHY/kg of diet. Treatment 4 also had 70 microg of 25D/kg of diet; NPP concentrations were reduced to account for the sparing effect of these additives. No differences in hatch to 49 d BW were observed between treatments in Exp 1 and 2, and only in Exp 3 were the BW of the NC broilers (2.86 kg) different (P < 0.05) from those fed the C, UMD, and UMD+PHY treatments (2.96, 2.94, and 2.98 kg, respectively). Cumulative NPP consumption per bird was lowest (P < 0.05) for broilers fed the UMD+PHY+25D treatment (8.65 g in Exp 3) compared with those fed the C, NC, UMD, and UMD+PHY treatments (18.19, 10.60, 13.63, and 11.01 g, respectively for Exp 3). Application of any of these treatments reduced total P and NPP consumption compared with C. The results of this series of floor pen Exp validate the UMD NPP recommendations for a 4-phase feed program and the PHY and 25D NPP-sparing effects observed in battery trials without negatively affecting broiler performance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. H. Chou, T. K. Chung, and B. Yu Effects of supplemental 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on growth performance, small intestinal morphology, and immune response of broiler chickens Poult. Sci., November 1, 2009; 88(11): 2333 - 2341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Powers and R. Angel A Review of the Capacity for Nutritional Strategies to Address Environmental Challenges in Poultry Production Poult. Sci., October 1, 2008; 87(10): 1929 - 1938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Powell, S. Johnston, L. Gaston, and L. L. Southern The Effect of Dietary Phosphorus Level and Phytase Supplementation on Growth Performance, Bone-Breaking Strength, and Litter Phosphorus Concentration in Broilers Poult. Sci., May 1, 2008; 87(5): 949 - 957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Catala-Gregori, V. Garcia, F. Hernandez, J. Madrid, and J. J. Ceron Response of broilers to feeding low-calcium and phosphorus diets plus phytase under different environmental conditions: body weight and tibiotarsus mineralization. Poult. Sci., November 1, 2006; 85(11): 1923 - 1931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]