Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dozier, W.
Right arrow Articles by Vizzier-Thaxton, Y
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dozier, W., 3rd
Right arrow Articles by Vizzier-Thaxton, Y
Poultry Science, Vol 84, Issue 8, 1332-1338
Copyright © 2005 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers

WA Dozier 3rd, JP Thaxton, SL Branton, GW Morgan, DM Miles, WB Roush, BD Lott, and Y Vizzier-Thaxton

USDA, Agriculture Research Service, Poultry Research Unit, PO Box 5367, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762-5367, USA. bdozier@msa-msstate.ars.usda.gov

This study examined responses of male broilers during a 49-d production cycle to 4 placement densities in 2 trials. Trials were pooled because no treatment x trial interaction occurred. In each trial, 1,488 male chicks were randomly placed into 32 floor pens to simulate final densities of 30 (37 chicks/pen), 35 (43 chicks/ pen), 40 (50 chicks/pen), and 45 (56 chicks/pen) kg of BW/m2 of floor space based on a projected final BW of 3.29 kg. Growth rate and nutrient utilization were similar (P > or = 0.05) among the treatments from 1 to 32 d of age. From 1 to 49 d, BW gain (P = 0.011) and feed consumption (P = 0.029) were adversely affected by increasing the placement density from 30 to 45 kg of BW/m2 of floor space. The reduction in cumulative BW gain due to placement density can be partially explained by less feed consumption as evidenced by 95.4% of the sums of squares of BW gain being attributable to feed consumption. Litter moisture content (P = 0.025) and foot pad lesion score (P = 0.001) increased linearly with increasing placement density. Upon processing, whole carcass and breast meat yields relative to BW were not affected (P > or = 0.05) as density increased from 30 to 45 kg/m2. The proportion of whole carcasses with scratches, but not tears, on the back and thighs increased (P = 0.021) as density increased. These results indicate that increasing the density beyond 30 kg/m2 elicited some negative effects on live performance of heavy broilers.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
C. Berri, J. Besnard, and C. Relandeau
Increasing Dietary Lysine Increases Final pH and Decreases Drip Loss of Broiler Breast Meat
Poult. Sci., March 1, 2008; 87(3): 480 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
E. Van Poucke, A. Van Nuffel, S. Van Dongen, B. Sonck, L. Lens, and F. A. M. Tuyttens
Experimental Stress Does Not Increase Fluctuating Asymmetry of Broiler Chickens at Slaughter Age
Poult. Sci., October 1, 2007; 86(10): 2110 - 2116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
I. Estevez
Density Allowances for Broilers: Where to Set the Limits?
Poult. Sci., June 1, 2007; 86(6): 1265 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
O. Cangar, J.-M. Aerts, E. Vranken, and D. Berckmans
Online Growth Control as an Advance in Broiler Farm Management
Poult. Sci., March 1, 2007; 86(3): 439 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Poultry Science Association.