Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Poult Sci 2006. 85:1855-1863
© 2006 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Dea, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Guan, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O’Dea, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Guan, L. L.

PRODUCTION, MODELING, AND EDUCATION

Investigating the Effects of Commercial Probiotics on Broiler Chick Quality and Production Efficiency

E. E. O’Dea*, G. M. Fasenko*,1, G. E. Allison{dagger}, D. R. Korver*, G. W. Tannock{ddagger} and L. L. Guan*

* Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2P5; {dagger} Medical School and School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200; and {ddagger} Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand 9001

1 Corresponding author: gaylene.fasenko{at}ualberta.ca

A study was undertaken to test the effect of 2 commercially available probiotics on the production efficiency of broiler chickens hatched from the same breeder flock at 3 different ages (28, 43, and 57 wk). At each of the 3 breeder flock ages, 1,600 broiler chickens were hatched and randomly allocated to 1 of 4 treatments: 1) no probiotics (control), 2) probiotic 1 administered in the drinking water, 3) probiotic 1 administered as a spray, and 4) probiotic 2 administered in the feed. A coccidiostat was included in the feed, but no other antimicrobial agents were given. Broilers were then reared on straw litter in identical floor pens for a period of 6 wk. There were no significant differences in broiler BW, feed conversion, or mortality between the probiotic treatments and the control group in any of the trials. The 43-wk-old breeder flock had the highest fertility and hatchability and the lowest percentage of chicks culled at hatching. Throughout the broiler production period, the broilers from the 43- and 57-wk-old breeder flocks had higher BW and weight gains than the broilers produced at 28 wk of breeder flock age. Broiler feed conversion over the 6-wk production period decreased as the breeder flock aged. Probiotics had no effect on chick quality or production efficiency in broilers produced by the breeder flock ages examined.

Key Words: probiotic • broiler production • gastrointestinal tract • chick quality • breeder flock age




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
A. L. Shaw, J. P. Blake, and E. T. Moran
Effects of flesh attachment on bone breaking and of phosphorus concentration on performance of broilers hatched from young and old flocks
Poult. Sci., February 1, 2010; 89(2): 295 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
S. F. Al-Zenki, A. Y. Al-Nasser, A. E. Al-Saffar, F. K. Abdullah, M. E. Al-Bahouh, A. S. Al-Haddad, H. Alomirah, and M. Mashaly
Effects of using a chicken-origin competitive exclusion culture and probiotic cultures on reducing Salmonella in broilers
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2009; 18(1): 23 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
J. F. Flint and M. R. Garner
Feeding beneficial bacteria: A natural solution for increasing efficiency and decreasing pathogens in animal agriculture
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2009; 18(2): 367 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Poultry Science Association.