Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Poult Sci 2006. 85:1867-1874
© 2006 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aksit, M.
Right arrow Articles by Özdemir, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aksit, M.
Right arrow Articles by Özdemir, D.

ENVIRONMENT, WELL-BEING, AND BEHAVIOR

Effects of Temperature During Rearing and Crating on Stress Parameters and Meat Quality of Broilers

M. Aksit*, S. Yalçin{dagger},1, S. Özkan{dagger}, K. Metin{ddagger} and D. Özdemir*

* Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, and {ddagger} Faculty of Art and Science, Department of Biology, Adnan Menderes University, TR-09100 Aydin, Turkey; and {dagger} Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, Ege University, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey

1 Corresponding author: servet.yalcin{at}ege.edu.tr

Two trials were conducted to study the effects of heat stress during rearing (trial 1) and crating (trial 2) on broiler stress parameters and fear, breast meat quality, and nutrient composition. The relationships between stress parameters and meat quality traits were also determined. Trial 1 consisted of 3 temperature treatments from 3 to 7 wk: control (temperature was 22°C); diurnal cyclic temperature (temperature was 28°C from 1000 to 1700 h and 22°C from 1700 to 1000 h); and constant high temperature (34°C; temperature was 34°C). In trial 2, broilers from the control and 34°C groups in trial 1 were used. Broilers in each group were placed in transport cages. The 9 cages from the control group were divided into 3 groups and placed into 3 rooms at 15, 22, or 34°C for 2 h. The 3 cages from the 34°C group were also held in the room at 34°C (34–34°C). Diurnal cyclic temperature had no effect on BW up to 5 wk of age. The effect of 34°C constant temperature on BW of broilers increased with age. Plasma levels of glucose and albumin increased by 34°C, but no dramatic change in levels occurred when those broilers were crated at 34°C. The heterophil:lymphocyte (H:L) was higher for the 34–34°C broilers and the control broilers in the 34°C room than those from the 22 and 15°C room. Breast muscle glycogen level decreased in broilers reared under diurnal cyclic or high temperatures. A lower pH and higher lightness (L*) and redness values and redness:yellowness were found in meat for broilers from both 34°C and 34–34°C groups. Higher H:L was associated with breast muscle pH according to first-order polynomial regression. The H:L had a significant effect on L* values, which were described by a second-order polynomial regression. Blood glucose level was positively correlated with L* and redness values. Duration of tonic immobility was neither influenced by rearing and crating temperatures nor associated with meat quality parameters.

Key Words: stress • meat quality • broiler




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
C. G. Scanes
Perspectives on Analytical Techniques and Standardization
Poult. Sci., November 1, 2008; 87(11): 2175 - 2177.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
H.-W. Cheng and L. Jefferson
Different Behavioral and Physiological Responses in Two Genetic Lines of Laying Hens After Transportation
Poult. Sci., May 1, 2008; 87(5): 885 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Poultry Science Association.