HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Delezie, E. Articles by Decuypere, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Delezie, E. Articles by Decuypere, E.

Consumers’ Preferences Toward Techniques for Improving Manual Catching of Poultry

E. Delezie^*,1, W. Verbeke, J. De Tavernier and E. Decuypere^*

^* Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Biosystems, Division Livestock-Nutrition-Quality, University of Leuven, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium; Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Agricultural Economics, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium; and Faculty of Theology, Research Unit of Theological Ethics, University of Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

¹ Corresponding author: evelyne.delezie{at}biw.kuleuven.be

Growing interest in ameliorating animal welfare has prompted numerous studies that compare various aspects of manual and mechanical catching. In general, mechanical catching has been adopted as a realistic alternative for manual catching. The success of a catching machine as an alternative for manual catching does not only depend on its practical applicability, but also on its acceptance by "the general public." In the history of technological change, public perception of new technologies has often been ambivalent. Against this background, it is important to know how consumers perceive the production methods. This paper provides an evaluation of the preferences for catching methods by "society" to investigate whether there is a shift in preference due to the confrontation with video segments and the potential effect of awareness and importance attached to animal welfare on preference. Data were gathered through a questionnaire-based survey, including 450 respondents, performed in Belgium. For this study, the data indicated that when subjects were provided information concerning catching methods of broilers, they liked the technology much more. However, for those respondents without prior awareness of both catching methods or with high importance attached to animal welfare, giving information could not convince them of the advantage of using a mechanical catching machine. It is obvious that preference varies with the awareness and experience of the respondents. Future research should move forward from simple assessments of consumer concerns about the technologies and focus more directly on questions and issues related to the consumer’s expected bottlenecks of these technologies. In this way, working at a better understanding can directly influence the acceptance of these technologies.

Key Words: catching poultry • animal welfare • consumer • perception • survey

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Vanhonacker and W. Verbeke Buying higher welfare poultry products? Profiling Flemish consumers who do and do not Poult. Sci., December 1, 2009; 88(12): 2702 - 2711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Delezie, W. Verbeke, J. De Tavernier, and E. Decuypere Consumer Perception Versus Scientific Evidence About Alternatives for Manual Catching of Broilers in Belgium Poult. Sci., February 1, 2007; 86(2): 413 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]