Poult. Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boa-Amponsem, K
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boa-Amponsem, K
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, P.
Poultry Science, Vol 85, Issue 2, 173-177
Copyright © 2006 by Poultry Science Association


Articles

Memory antibody responses of broiler and leghorn chickens as influenced by dietary vitamin E and route of sheep red blood cell administration

K Boa-Amponsem, M Picard, ME Blair, B Meldrum, and PB Siegel

Animal and Poultry Sciences Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg 24061-0306, USA.

Influences of dietary levels of vitamin E fed to hens and their progeny, and routes of SRBC inoculation on antibody responses of diverse populations of chickens were studied. Populations were a commercial broiler sire line (C), 2 commercial broiler dam lines (A and B), and Leghorn lines selected for high (H) or low (L) antibody response to SRBC. Dams from lines A and B were fed diets supplemented with either 10 or 300 IU/kg of vitamin E, whereas dams from lines H and L received only the diet with 10 IU of vitamin E/kg. Progeny from matings of C males with A and B females as well as H and L females mated to males from their respective lines were hatched on the same day and fed diets supplemented with either 10 or 300 IU/kg of vitamin E. Breeders were the same age and eggs were incubated in the same machine. Chicks were inoculated on d 14 intravenously with 0.1 mL of a 0.5% suspension of SRBC or intramuscularly with 0.1 mL of a 25% suspension of SRBC. Antibody response was measured 6 and 14 d later. Chicks received a booster i.m. inoculation of 0.1 mL of 25% SRBC on d 28. Titers were again measured 6 and 14 d later. Level of vitamin E fed to dams did not affect progeny BW or plasma vitamin E levels. Although titers were higher following i.v. than i.m. inoculation, the degree of difference varied among stocks. Dietary vitamin E level interacted with inoculation route with a greater response to the higher than lower level of vitamin E for i.v., but there was no difference for i.m. There were stock x level of vitamin E and stock x route of inoculation interactions for secondary responses to SRBC inoculation. Stock rankings after the first inoculation were not predictive of the rankings after the second inoculation. The 30-fold increase in dietary level of vitamin E resulted in >12-fold differences in plasma levels of vitamin E. Overall, there was a stock-dependent influence of dietary vitamin E on growth and humoral antibody response.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Poultry Science Association.