|
|
||||||||
Articles |
Animal and Poultry Sciences Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg 24061-0306, USA.
Influences of dietary levels of vitamin E fed to hens and their progeny, and routes of SRBC inoculation on antibody responses of diverse populations of chickens were studied. Populations were a commercial broiler sire line (C), 2 commercial broiler dam lines (A and B), and Leghorn lines selected for high (H) or low (L) antibody response to SRBC. Dams from lines A and B were fed diets supplemented with either 10 or 300 IU/kg of vitamin E, whereas dams from lines H and L received only the diet with 10 IU of vitamin E/kg. Progeny from matings of C males with A and B females as well as H and L females mated to males from their respective lines were hatched on the same day and fed diets supplemented with either 10 or 300 IU/kg of vitamin E. Breeders were the same age and eggs were incubated in the same machine. Chicks were inoculated on d 14 intravenously with 0.1 mL of a 0.5% suspension of SRBC or intramuscularly with 0.1 mL of a 25% suspension of SRBC. Antibody response was measured 6 and 14 d later. Chicks received a booster i.m. inoculation of 0.1 mL of 25% SRBC on d 28. Titers were again measured 6 and 14 d later. Level of vitamin E fed to dams did not affect progeny BW or plasma vitamin E levels. Although titers were higher following i.v. than i.m. inoculation, the degree of difference varied among stocks. Dietary vitamin E level interacted with inoculation route with a greater response to the higher than lower level of vitamin E for i.v., but there was no difference for i.m. There were stock x level of vitamin E and stock x route of inoculation interactions for secondary responses to SRBC inoculation. Stock rankings after the first inoculation were not predictive of the rankings after the second inoculation. The 30-fold increase in dietary level of vitamin E resulted in >12-fold differences in plasma levels of vitamin E. Overall, there was a stock-dependent influence of dietary vitamin E on growth and humoral antibody response.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |